Invasão da Ucrânia

  • 8893 Respostas
  • 1108037 Visualizações
*

Duarte

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 3313
  • Recebeu: 449 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1692 vez(es)
  • +2599/-1142
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6990 em: Agosto 05, 2024, 02:01:12 pm »
Ainda que poucos, e ainda que a efetiva capacidade para alterar grande coisa seja a conhecida. agora é oficial:


São mais um prego no caixão para a operação militar especial de 3 dias.
слава Україна!
“Putin’s failing Ukraine invasion proves Russia is no superpower"
The Only Good Fascist Is a Dead Fascist
Trump é o novo Neville Chamberlain, mas com o intelecto de quem não conseguiu completar a 4a classe.
 

*

os_pero

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 694
  • Recebeu: 270 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 94 vez(es)
  • +1523/-111
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6991 em: Agosto 06, 2024, 11:19:58 am »
Quando se diz que a Ucrânia luta com uma mão atrás das costas é isto

https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1820747579048534410
Citar
Ukraine had the opportunity to destroy dozens of Russian aircraft with ATACMS missiles, but the U.S. prohibited their use, according to Forbes. In early summer, the Russian 47th Guards Air Regiment parked numerous Su-34 jets at the "Malyshevo" airbase, 160 km from the border. Ukraine requested permission from the U.S. to strike this base with ATACMS missiles, but Washington denied the request due to fears of escalation.



Imagens do resultado de um ataque a uma base aérea Russa.

https://x.com/GlasnostGone/status/1820484376452567162
Citar
It's lucky Russia had that double fence and a watchtower protecting their ammo storage site at Morozovsk airfield, or things might of got really bad 😀. #Ukraine strikes back.



https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/1820721802114453998
Citar
The destroyed Russian weapons storage facility at Morozovsk airfield.
Some munitions are FAB-500 LH aerial bombs; R-77 air-to-air missiles; KAB-1500LH precision bombs; and possibly ODAB-500 thermobaric aerial bombs, which would explain the mess.
1/2



https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/1820737401918009471
Citar
This image is a Khybiny-M (L-175) electronic countermeasures (ECM) container for Su-34 Fullback fighter-bombers stationed at this airfield.
Likely then at least one Su-34 was destroyed.



(Esta conta do X centra-se muito em contagem de stocks Russos)
https://x.com/hizzo_jay/status/1820760177458418159
Citar
That´s how a dying tank stock looks like.

 

*

os_pero

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 694
  • Recebeu: 270 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 94 vez(es)
  • +1523/-111
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6992 em: Agosto 06, 2024, 11:35:38 am »
Entretanto a novidade hj é um suposto ataque/raid/operação/ofensiva/... (ainda está tudo muito confuso, havendo informações contraditórias e sem grandes confirmações para se perceber o que se está a passar e a dimensão) na zona de kursk por parte dos Ucranianos, há ainda pouca informação, mas uns canais Russos falam que os Ucranianos penetraram 10 km em Território Russo, e o ataque recorreu ao uso de blindados e que os Ucranianos já fizeram várias prisioneiros, do outro lado outros canais Russos dizem que o ataque foi repelido e que não se passou grande coisa.

Deixo aqui a threads principais (abrir para ler mais detalhes):

https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1820731536930423151
Citar
More and more Russian channels now claim -not providing any video evidence until now- that a border incursion near Gogolevka-Sudzha and near Kurilovka is happening in the Kursk region. The images allegedly shows units operating cross border.


https://x.com/PStyle0ne1/status/1820719978829517077
Citar
BREAKING ‼️ Russians confirm Ukrainian troops are active across the border in Kursk

They speak of an advance of a few 100s m inside Russia. However, it seems some groups are actually several kms inside Russia.

Who is there, AFAIK?
RDK
Maybe 22nd
Drones units

Relatos de uma conta Russa:
https://x.com/Roberto05246129/status/1820764208813760585
Citar
#UkraineRussiaWar #Kharkiv
#ATACMS #Toretsk #F16
#Bakhmut #Sevastopol

 In the Sudzhansky and Glukhov operational directions of the Sumy Front, the operational and tactical situation continues to be very tense.

In the first case, having deployed "roving" crews of 155-mm long-range self-propelled howitzers "Krab" and MLRS RM-70 "Vampire" near Yunakovka and Khrapovshchina and having carried out artillery preparation against the strongholds of the Russian Armed Forces in the settlements of Oleshnya, Gogolevka and Rubanshchina, and also having struck at Sudzha, from 2 to 3 platoon-tactical formations of the enemy attempted to break through to the Sudzha area with the support of from a platoon to a company of armored vehicles.

ATGM, FPV drone "kamikaze" and 2S43 "Malva" self-propelled gun crews managed to stop the enemy breakthrough between Oleshnya and Gogolevka. 152-mm guided artillery shells ZOF95 "Krasnopol-M2" are used. The battle continues at this moment.

Enemy formations are trying to gain a foothold at an altitude of 205 m in the area of ​​the Sudzha checkpoint, but are being subjected to sufficient resistance from the Russian army.

At this moment, the operators of the S350M "Supercam" UAV, ZALA 421-16E HD, as well as the counter-battery radar systems "Zoopark-1M" and "Yastreb-AV" began an operation to expose enemy artillery positions and suppress them using the "kamikaze" UAVs "Lancet-3" and "Krasnopolye-M2".

To the north, in the Glukhov operational direction near the settlement of Privolye, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have also deployed a mechanized company-tactical formation and continue to pull up heavy armored vehicles through Glukhov. Actions are planned in the direction of the Krupets checkpoint and the settlement of Kozino. Russian MLRS "Tornado-G" are already working to suppress the mechanized "backbone" being formed.
Evgeniy Damantsev



As imagens que começam a aparecer são ainda meio que contraditórias pois do lado Ucraniano só se ve equipamento ligeiro, mas por outro lado há imagens de algumas aldeias bastante destruídas.
 

*

P44

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20739
  • Recebeu: 6950 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7968 vez(es)
  • +8110/-12839
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6993 em: Agosto 06, 2024, 11:36:56 am »
A Ucrânia sempre afundou o sub Rostov-on-Don?  ???
"[Os portugueses são]um povo tão dócil e tão bem amestrado que até merecia estar no Jardim Zoológico"
-Dom Januário Torgal Ferreira, Bispo das Forças Armadas
 

*

papatango

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8085
  • Recebeu: 1327 vez(es)
  • +6523/-1401
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6994 em: Agosto 06, 2024, 02:16:27 pm »


Sobre o submarino Rostov-on-Don há algumas coisas a considerar...

A primeira, foi que embora o submarino já tivesse sido colocado fora de combate quando estava na doca, ainda estava em condições de flutuar e os russos tentaram tudo para o esconder.

Isto permite concluir que os russos ainda consideram esta arma relevante, e sabem que o seu custo é proibitivo, preferindo tentar esconder um navio muito danificado para o tentarem voltar a colocar ao serviço.

Entre as várias interpretações, está a de que os restantes submarinos da frota russa do Mar Negro, mesmo sem terem sido atingidos, podem estar em muito mau estado de operacionalidade, o que leva os russos a tentar desesperadamente fazer tudo para salvar este.

Os ucranianos já disseram que tinham destruido completamente o Rostov-on-Don, pelo que agora dizerem que o afundaram, é algo que precisa confirmação.
Só que é muito complicado confirmar o afundamento de um navio. Só os russos podem de fato confirmar isso.
É muito mais fácil enganar uma pessoa, que explicar-lhe que foi enganada ...
Contra a Estupidez, não temos defesa
https://shorturl.at/bdusk
 

*

os_pero

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 694
  • Recebeu: 270 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 94 vez(es)
  • +1523/-111
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6995 em: Agosto 06, 2024, 02:55:58 pm »
A Ucrânia sempre afundou o sub Rostov-on-Don?  ???

O que existe de "evidencias" é isto:

https://x.com/ryankakiuchan/status/1820268694800658454
Citar
Ukraine claims it sunk Russian Navy Improved Kilo class diesel-electric attack submarine Rostov-on-Don in an attack on Sevastopol by units of missile forces.

Satellite imagery shows a floating installation at Sevastopol’s port, was clearly damaged.
https://twz.com/air/ukraine-situation-report-russian-submarine-destroyed-kyiv-claims


Segundo a mesma conta e outras era o Rostov-on-Don, mas como diz o paptango não existe 100% certezas.

 

*

os_pero

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 694
  • Recebeu: 270 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 94 vez(es)
  • +1523/-111
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6996 em: Agosto 06, 2024, 03:57:45 pm »
Para variar a este novo evento nas fronteiras Russas não está tão resolvido como algumas contes Russas querem dar a entender


(Com vídeo)
https://x.com/Archer83Able/status/1820823946955981025
Citar
Like a movie scene: A pair of Sukhoi Su-25 attack planes making a low pass over a highway while a truck is seen burning on the roadside in the vicinity of the Russian town of Sudzha, Kursk Oblast.


https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1820833689904763189
Citar
Sudzha, Kursk region 💥🔥

https://x.com/PStyle0ne1/status/1820830534907437262
Citar
‼️IMPORTANT ‼️ The 22nd is in KURSK, Russia

and they need our help.

This operation is different from the usual raid in Belgorod, believe me


https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1820805145917018460
Citar
👀🇺🇦 Ukrainian military intelligence refused to comment on the topic of the "breakthrough" in Kursk region. However, these actions definitely did not involve Russian Volunteer Corps, - NV

P.S. Do you think it will be a limited operation or something much more interesting? 🧐


https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1820770175429300363
Citar
👀 "Russia does not control the border", - head of the CPD Kovalenko.

❗️Russian Z-channels also write that their officials are lying, and the war zone is expanding.
 

*

ricardonunes

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 5365
  • Recebeu: 539 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 109 vez(es)
  • +613/-9438
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6997 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 09:01:01 am »
Para variar a este novo evento nas fronteiras Russas não está tão resolvido como algumas contes Russas querem dar a entender


Parece que foi mais um Banzai Charge bem suicidido   ::)

Potius mori quam foedari
 

*

ricardonunes

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 5365
  • Recebeu: 539 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 109 vez(es)
  • +613/-9438
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6998 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 09:06:39 am »
Citar
The Ukrainian channel "Resident" comments on the Ukrainian Armed Forces' sabotage in the Kursk region:

Our source in the General Staff said that the attack on the Kursk region is bogged down, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be forced to roll back due to heavy losses. The commander-in-chief counted on the surprise effect when planning the operation, but now it is clear that the enemy was expecting our attack in this direction.

Our source in the General Staff said that the command staff in the Donetsk direction does not understand the Commander-in-Chief's strategic plan to attack the Kursk region, since they are denied reserves and equipment to hold the front, and here elite units are thrown into battle. Serious discontent is brewing among the military with the actions of Syrsky, who is unable to stabilize the front, but at the same time carries out a PR attack on Russian territory and wastes the best units.
Potius mori quam foedari
 

*

os_pero

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 694
  • Recebeu: 270 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 94 vez(es)
  • +1523/-111
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #6999 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 09:16:20 am »
Citar
The Ukrainian channel "Resident" comments on the Ukrainian Armed Forces' sabotage in the Kursk region:

Our source in the General Staff said that the attack on the Kursk region is bogged down, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be forced to roll back due to heavy losses. The commander-in-chief counted on the surprise effect when planning the operation, but now it is clear that the enemy was expecting our attack in this direction.

Our source in the General Staff said that the command staff in the Donetsk direction does not understand the Commander-in-Chief's strategic plan to attack the Kursk region, since they are denied reserves and equipment to hold the front, and here elite units are thrown into battle. Serious discontent is brewing among the military with the actions of Syrsky, who is unable to stabilize the front, but at the same time carries out a PR attack on Russian territory and wastes the best units.

Vamos ver os próximos dias, o que sai daqui, se os Ucranianos tentam conquistar mais território ou tentam manter o território conquistado, ou se recuam, aparentemente não foi só um raid, mas ...

Pessoalmente eu tenho uma teoria se o objetivo era "conquistar" e manter território Russo.

PS: Tenho algumas dúvidas se os Russos estavam realmente a espera do ataque, há vários indícios que refutam essa ideia.
« Última modificação: Agosto 07, 2024, 09:18:23 am por os_pero »
 

*

os_pero

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 694
  • Recebeu: 270 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 94 vez(es)
  • +1523/-111
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #7000 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 09:28:56 am »
(vídeo)
https://x.com/blyskavka_ua/status/1821094560790880291
Citar
⚡️ The moment when a Russian helicopter was shot down by an FPV drone yesterday in the Kursk region (russia) has been posted online.

👉  Follow @blyskavka_ua


https://x.com/RsRobert78/status/1821084543597568319
Citar
Multiple Russian sources confirm that Ukraine has pulled up a fair amount of air defense near Kursk region, which makes it hard for Russian aviation to give close air support to defending units.

In this message they also confirm that 'several' villages were lost to Ukraine.

 

*

ricardonunes

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 5365
  • Recebeu: 539 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 109 vez(es)
  • +613/-9438
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #7001 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 09:32:42 am »

Vamos ver os próximos dias, o que sai daqui, se os Ucranianos tentam conquistar mais território ou tentam manter o território conquistado, ou se recuam, aparentemente não foi só um raid, mas ...

Pessoalmente eu tenho uma teoria se o objetivo era "conquistar" e manter território Russo.

PS: Tenho algumas dúvidas se os Russos estavam realmente a espera do ataque, há vários indícios que refutam essa ideia.

Esta como as incursões nas ilhotas do Dneper só suicídios, ordens superiores de quem se está a cagar literalmente para os homens sob o seu comando....

Mas deixo a questão, onde estavam os F16 para proteger as tropas dos SU25???   
Potius mori quam foedari
 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 23143
  • Recebeu: 4202 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2950 vez(es)
  • +2923/-4530
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #7002 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 11:07:15 am »
Citação de: Ukrainian Air Force
Let's start hunting!

Contra a Esquerda woke e a Direita populista marchar, marchar!...[/u].

 
Os seguintes utilizadores agradeceram esta mensagem: Lightning, PTWolf

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 23143
  • Recebeu: 4202 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2950 vez(es)
  • +2923/-4530
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #7003 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 11:12:31 am »

Vamos ver os próximos dias, o que sai daqui, se os Ucranianos tentam conquistar mais território ou tentam manter o território conquistado, ou se recuam, aparentemente não foi só um raid, mas ...

Pessoalmente eu tenho uma teoria se o objetivo era "conquistar" e manter território Russo.

PS: Tenho algumas dúvidas se os Russos estavam realmente a espera do ataque, há vários indícios que refutam essa ideia.

Esta como as incursões nas ilhotas do Dneper só suicídios, ordens superiores de quem se está a cagar literalmente para os homens sob o seu comando....

Mas deixo a questão, onde estavam os F16 para proteger as tropas dos SU25???

 :arrow: https://twitter.com/ChrisO_wiki/status/1821099373251428640

De nada.
Contra a Esquerda woke e a Direita populista marchar, marchar!...[/u].

 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 23143
  • Recebeu: 4202 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2950 vez(es)
  • +2923/-4530
Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Responder #7004 em: Agosto 07, 2024, 11:17:01 am »
Did a small Ukrainian FPV drone manage to hit a Russian Mi-28 Havoc attack helicopter in mid-flight?.

On August 7, 2024, Andrii Tsaplienko reported that Ukrainian drone operators successfully hit the rear propeller of a Russian Mi-28 Havoc attack helicopter in the Kursk region. If confirmed with aftermath images or video, this incident will once again demonstrate the increasing effectiveness of Ukrainian unmanned aerial systems (UAS), particularly small, inexpensive FPV drones, in targeting high-value military assets. This event is also part of Ukraine's broader strategy to employ various types of drones to disrupt Russian military operations on the ground, at sea, and in the air.



Ukrainian drone operators may have successfully hit the rear propeller of a Russian Mil Mi-28 Havoc, an attack helicopter developed in the late 1970s to meet the need for a dedicated attack helicopter superior to the multi-role Mi-24 Hind. (Picture source: Telegram/Andrii Tsaplienko and Russian social media)

Ukraine's deployment of FPV (First-Person View) drones has provided notable tactical and strategic advantages against Russia. According to Euromaidan, between August 2023 and January 2024, Ukraine deployed around 3,886 FPV drones, compared to Russia's 2,889 in the same period. These drones have primarily targeted Russian military vehicles and equipment, maintaining an advantage in daily strikes. The low cost of FPV drones, often as low as $284 for 7-inch models, makes them a practical choice for high-precision strikes. Additionally, research by analyst Volodymyr Dacenko indicates that drones equipped with grenade drop mechanisms or used as single-use munitions are highly cost-effective for destroying enemy infantry and equipment. For instance, targeting infantry with FPV drones can be nearly seven times cheaper than using more advanced systems like the American Switchblade 300.

Despite China's restrictions on exporting drone components, Ukraine has managed to maintain and expand FPV drone production through complex procurement routes and domestic innovation. Although these restrictions complicate procurement, Ukraine's collaboration with Western allies and local manufacturing has allowed for continuous improvements in drone technology and long-range deployment. However, there are concerns about potential escalation and strategic stability, especially with attacks on sensitive targets like the Voronezh-M nuclear early-warning radar station on May 26, 2024.

or Ukraine, FPV drones offer tactical advantages, especially in trench warfare. Their ability to navigate and strike within confined spaces like trenches and dugouts makes them effective against fortified positions. Ukrainian forces use these drones for offensive strikes and anti-drone operations, engaging Russian UAVs to protect their positions. At a strategic level, Ukraine's long-range drones have successfully targeted locations deep within Russia, including Moscow and critical oil facilities. The strategy is to degrade Russia's military resources and impose economic and psychological costs. Targeting oil refineries and depots disrupts the fuel supply crucial for Russian military operations and impacts the Russian economy, which heavily relies on oil exports.

Therefore, Ukraine's drone production capacity has grown significantly in 2024, with projections to produce over one million drones by the year's end. By early 2024, approximately 200,000 FPV drones had been produced to address artillery shell shortages on the front lines. The production capacity is set to reach up to two million drones of various types, including models like the Bober and Liutyi, capable of long-range precision strikes. This scale-up involves over 200 Ukrainian companies in the UAV sector, with monthly production capabilities of around 150,000 units, providing Ukrainian forces with means to locate and target Russian helicopters such as the Mil Mi-28.

The Mil Mi-28, known by its NATO reporting name "Havoc," is a Russian all-weather, day-night, tandem, two-seat anti-armor attack helicopter. Developed in the late 1970s to meet the need for a dedicated attack helicopter superior to the multi-role Mi-24, its first prototype flew in 1982. It was not until the late 1990s and early 2000s that the Mi-28N "Night Hunter" variant, equipped for night operations, entered full production. The helicopter was officially introduced into Russian military service in the mid-2000s, gradually replacing older models like the Mi-24 Hind.

The latest variants, such as the Mi-28NM, feature enhanced stealth, extended operational range, and advanced weapons systems. Export variants like the Mi-28NE have broadened the helicopter's deployment to international operators. Training variants like the Mi-28UB, with dual controls for pilot training, ensure the Mi-28 remains an effective attack helicopter.

The Mi-28 features a conventional pod-and-boom configuration with a five-blade main rotor and a four-blade tail rotor. Powered by two Klimov TV3-117VMA turboshaft engines, each providing 2,200 horsepower, this helicopter can reach speeds of up to 324 km/h. It is heavily armored, with a cockpit that can withstand impacts from 12.7 to 14.5 mm caliber bullets. The Mi-28 is equipped with modern avionics, including a helmet-mounted display for the pilot and a suite of sensors and targeting systems for effective combat performance. The Mi-28's weaponry includes munitions for both air-to-ground and air-to-air engagements.


The Mi-28's performance in Ukraine has been mixed, as Ukrainian forces, equipped with Western-supplied anti-aircraft weapons like the Stinger missile system and the Javelin anti-tank missile, have successfully targeted and downed several Mi-28 helicopters. (Picture source: Twitter/Ukraine Weapons Tracker)

https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/russia-ukraine-war-2022/did-a-small-ukrainian-fpv-drone-manage-to-hit-a-russian-mi-28-havoc-attack-helicopter-in-mid-flight

Vídeo do drone:

https://twitter.com/hoje_no/status/1821121470442926427
Contra a Esquerda woke e a Direita populista marchar, marchar!...[/u].