Bom dia.
Não sei se alguém já fez este exercício, mas, por curiosidade, perguntei ao ChatGPT qual a melhor opção para a FAP.
A resposta foi a seguinte:
Selecting the best fighter aircraft for the Portuguese Air Force involves considering various factors such as operational requirements, budget constraints, strategic goals, and existing infrastructure. Here’s a comparison of the F-35 and Gripen E, along with some thoughts on other potential contenders:
F-35 Lightning II
Advantages:
1. Stealth Capabilities: The F-35 is a fifth-generation fighter with advanced stealth features, making it difficult to detect by enemy radar.
2. Advanced Avionics and Sensors: It offers superior situational awareness with state-of-the-art sensors and avionics, which integrate data from multiple sources.
3. Multirole Capability: The F-35 can perform a wide range of missions, including air superiority, ground attack, electronic warfare, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).
4. Interoperability: As many NATO countries operate the F-35, it ensures high levels of interoperability in joint missions and exercises.
**Disadvantages:**
1. Cost:The F-35 is significantly more expensive in terms of both procurement and operational costs compared to other fighters like the Gripen E.
2. Maintenance and Logistics: It requires advanced maintenance infrastructure and a reliable supply chain, which can be more demanding than other aircraft.
Gripen E
Advantages:
1. Cost-Effectiveness: The Gripen E is less expensive to purchase and operate than the F-35, making it attractive for countries with budget constraints.
2. Operational Flexibility: It is designed for ease of maintenance and can operate from shorter and less prepared airstrips.
3. Advanced Avionics: The Gripen E features modern avionics, a powerful electronic warfare suite, and is designed to be easily upgraded.
4. Performance: It offers excellent maneuverability and performance in both air-to-air and air-to-ground roles.
Disadvantages:
1. Less Stealth: The Gripen E lacks the stealth capabilities of the F-35, which could be a disadvantage in high-threat environments.
2. Smaller Operational Network: While interoperable with NATO forces, the Gripen E is not as widely used as the F-35, which might affect parts availability and joint operations.
Other Contenders
Eurofighter Typhoon:
- Pros: Excellent performance, multirole capabilities, good interoperability within NATO, and strong air-to-air combat capabilities.
- Cons: Higher operational costs compared to the Gripen E and lacks the stealth features of the F-35.
Dassault Rafale:
- Pros: Multirole capabilities, excellent performance, advanced avionics, and interoperability within NATO.
- Cons: Higher acquisition and operational costs, and it is not as stealthy as the F-35.
F-16V Viper:
- Pros: Proven reliability, cost-effective, extensive upgrade potential, and widely used within NATO.
- Cons: Older design compared to the F-35 and Gripen E, and lacks the same level of stealth and advanced sensors.
Conclusion
The best choice for the Portuguese Air Force depends on their specific needs and budget. If Portugal prioritizes advanced stealth, cutting-edge technology, and interoperability within NATO, the F-35 might be the best option despite its higher cost. If budget constraints and operational flexibility are more critical, the Gripen E offers a highly capable and cost-effective solution. Other aircraft like the Eurofighter Typhoon or Dassault Rafale also provide strong capabilities but come with their own cost and strategic considerations.
A thorough analysis involving cost-benefit evaluations, threat assessments, and alignment with national defense strategies will ultimately determine the best fighter aircraft for Portugal.
O que pensam disto? Penso, considerando as capacidades, custos e soberania alargada (inclui também a industrial, intelectual e logística, além da capacidade de defesa armada), que ficaríamos melhor servidos com F-16 modernizados e entrar num programa de 6th geração. Sobretudo considerando todos os problemas com o f-35 block 4. Mas é a opinião de um leigo.
