51

Marinha Portuguesa / Re: Substituição das Fragatas Classe Vasco da Gama

« Última mensagem por sivispacem em Janeiro 11, 2026, 08:39:40 pm »

Mau... então não era Fevereiro???
Vão gozar com o das Caldas!

Por Itália diz-se que as primeiras EVO serão para Portugal e que as deles só serão integradas lá para 2034/5.

Já que ninguém diz nada, vou eu colocando aqui os boatos...

Afinal vai ser já na 4 feira 

https://cnnportugal.iol.pt/defesa/uniao-europeia/defesa-bruxelas-aprova-na-quarta-feira-plano-portugues-para-emprestimos-de-5-8-mil-milhoes-de-euros/20260111/6963ee92d34e0ec52ec1f6be

52

Portugal / Re: Reformar e Modernizar as Forças Armadas

« Última mensagem por sivispacem em Janeiro 11, 2026, 08:37:48 pm »

Pronto, já podeis respirar..... 

https://cnnportugal.iol.pt/defesa/uniao-europeia/defesa-bruxelas-aprova-na-quarta-feira-plano-portugues-para-emprestimos-de-5-8-mil-milhoes-de-euros/20260111/6963ee92d34e0ec52ec1f6be

Defesa: Bruxelas aprova na quarta-feira plano português para empréstimos de 5,8 mil milhões de euros

Há oito países que deverão ter 'luz verde' aos planos apresentados
A Comissão Europeia vai aprovar, na quarta-feira, o plano para Portugal aceder a 5,8 mil milhões de euros em empréstimos a condições favoráveis para investir em capacidades de defesa.

“Propusemos o SAFE [Instrumento de Ação para a Segurança da Europa], a nossa iniciativa de aquisição conjunta, há menos de um ano, e […] temos agora os planos dos Estados-membros. Planeamos aprovar metade deles já esta semana”, anunciou a presidente da Comissão Europeia, Ursula von der Leyen, em declarações a um pequeno grupo de jornalistas em Bruxelas, incluindo a Lusa.

Fontes europeias indicaram à Lusa que em causa estão oito países, de 18 candidatos, cujos planos deverão ter ‘luz verde’ na próxima quarta-feira, sendo eles Portugal, Roménia, Bélgica, Bulgária, Chipre, Dinamarca, Espanha e Croácia.

53

Exército Português / Re: Panhards ULTRAV M11 no Exército substituir ou upgrade ?

« Última mensagem por sivispacem em Janeiro 11, 2026, 08:17:58 pm »

não está tudo não e têm uma série de problemas

Imagino... desde aquele motor Peugeot de 90 cv ou lá ou que é, à suspensão, transmissão, a habitual e sacrossanta falta de meios rádio, às (aposto) deficientes manutenções e, claro está, os 40 anos de uso...

A única real mais valia das Panhard foi o seu carácter de transposição de rios, de resto a susbtituição por um mix de drones e Vamtac seria o melhor que poderia ser feito....

54

Mundo / Re: Transnístria

« Última mensagem por MMaria em Janeiro 11, 2026, 08:03:23 pm »

'Cuidem da trave que têm em vossos olhos antes de apontar o cisco no de outrem': então não se apresentem como esse tal de farol do mundo.

Sobre a Transnístria e os russos, estes são um dos maiores e mais sujos actores europeus*, mas o que não percebem é que isso de "pro russo/putin" na verdade é vossa incapacidade de perceber que, para boa parte do mundo, são todos 'farinha do mesmo saco', dentro de uma bolha de autocomplacência, chauvinismo e (suposta) superioridade moral.

*europa lato sensu: de Lisboa à Moscovo, de Glasgow à Tblissi, de Reykjavik à Ancara, de Murmansk à Heráclio.

Sds

55

Mundo / Re: Cuba

« Última mensagem por Duarte em Janeiro 11, 2026, 07:44:41 pm »

Trump tells Cuba to 'make a deal, before it is too late'

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2kv2gn62vo

Será que há pítrol nos mares da Cuba? 

56

Mundo / Re: Transnístria

« Última mensagem por yuwanko em Janeiro 11, 2026, 07:44:11 pm »

A realidade da história europeia é essa, e a dança de cores está ainda hoje longe de acabar:

 

Como se fosse só na Europa. Qual o continente em que isto não acontece?

57

Conflitos do Presente / Re: Invasão da Ucrânia

« Última mensagem por Duarte em Janeiro 11, 2026, 07:40:01 pm »

UK defence secretary says he would kidnap Putin

https://en.apa.az/europe/uk-defence-secretary-says-he-would-kidnap-putin-488612

On a visit to the site of a drone strike on a high-rise residential building, he told the Kyiv Independent that, given the option of being able to kidnap any world leader, he would "take Putin into custody and hold him [to] account for war crimes."

58

Armadas/Sistemas de Armas / Re: U. S. Navy

« Última mensagem por P44 em Janeiro 11, 2026, 07:38:52 pm »

info graphic  in the  current  BURKE   Class  antennae

59

Marinha Portuguesa / Re: Substituição das Fragatas Classe Vasco da Gama

« Última mensagem por P44 em Janeiro 11, 2026, 07:21:55 pm »

1. FRAGATAS CLASSE VASCO DA GAMA (MEKO 200PN)
Situação Atual:

3 fragatas (NRP Vasco da Gama, NRP Álvares Cabral, NRP Corte-Real)
Em serviço desde 1990-1991 (34-35 anos)
2 unidades em modernização via NATO NSPA

Opção Recomendada: Naval Group FDI (Frégate de Défense et d'Intervention)
Justificação:

Marinha Portuguesa já sinalizou preferência pela FDI
Concorrência: Fincantieri FREMM/Constellation, mas FDI tem vantagem
Tamanho adequado: 4.500 ton vs 6.000+ ton das alternativas
Custo unitário: €600-700 milhões (vs €800M+ FREMM)
Já em produção para França e Grécia (risco técnico baixo)
Forte conteúdo industrial português possível

Especificações FDI:

Comprimento: 122m
Deslocamento: 4.500 ton
Armamento: 16 VLS Aster 15/30, 8 Exocet MM40 Blk3, canhão 76mm, 2x 20mm
Helicóptero: 1x NH90 ou equivalente
Radar AESA Thales Sea Fire
Sonar de casco e rebocado
Tripulação: ~150

Plano de Aquisição:

Fase 1 (2027-2029): Contrato para 2 fragatas
Fase 2 (2030-2033): Opção para 1 fragata adicional
Total: 2-3 fragatas FDI
Custo total: €1,4-2,1 mil milhões

Alternativa económica:

TKMS MEKO A-200: €400-500M unitário, menos capacidades mas adequada para patrulha


2. CORVETAS/OPVs - Continuação Classe VIANA DO CASTELO
Situação Atual:

4 OPVs Classe Viana do Castelo em serviço (2011-2019)
6 OPVs Classe Viana do Castelo 3ª série já contratados (€300M)
Entregas: 2027-2031
Substituem: Corvetas João Coutinho e Baptista de Andrade

Isso vem de onde? AI?

As FDI outra vez?  Quando já foram escolhidas as FREMM?

60

Mundo / Re: Estarão os EUA a ficar para trás?

« Última mensagem por Duarte em Janeiro 11, 2026, 07:19:48 pm »

When it comes to ICE encounters, what are the rules — and your rights?

https://www.ms.now/news/when-it-comes-to-ice-encounters-what-are-the-rules-and-your-rights

"It is clear that US citizens' ignorance of federal laws and law enforcement duties, procedures, and limits of authority is getting to the point where it is deadly. I spent probably 3 hours watching and re-watching, and finding every single video and angle I could of the situation in Minnesota yesterday and came to one immovable conclusion based off of what I saw and what I know from a professional standpoint. This is long, but please give it a read.
"As a former officer, let me make something clear: ICE agents ARE NOT police officers, deputy sheriffs, or troopers. They are not local/state law enforcement. They are not federal criminal law enforcement. They have an INCREDIBLY limited scope of authority, and that scope of authority exists in detaining and arresting with probable cause and/or SIGNED WARRANTS those investigated and suspected of being in the US illegally.
"They cannot just pull anyone over for a traffic violation or because their car is in a place they don't want it. They have NO authority to pull people over for ANYTHING other than immigration enforcement- and even then that involves probable cause, such as a known vehicle of someone they have been tracking, or a warrant. On very rare occasions they have the legal authority to pull someone over if they are threatening the lives of others, but that was not happening in this case. They do not have the training nor the authority to pull ANYONE else over. They cannot arrest legal citizens. They cannot detain legal citizens without probable cause to believe they might not be legal. They have ZERO authority to be attempting to force entry into a vehicle- without even identifying themselves, without a warrant, without exigent circumstances such as a life being directly threatened- that is trying to drive down the street without probable cause in relation to IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT.
"This ENTIRE situation in Minnesota was outside of the scope of legal authority from the get go. None of it was done within the scope of authority of ICE. Every single behavior those agents made was procedurally incorrect, done without proper authority, and was based off of intimidation and the assumption that people do not understand the law and their rights in regards to interactions with ICE.
"On no planet should an officer, agent, or any human being ever step in front of a car in 'drive' that is actively trying to leave and use their body as a shield to prevent a person from LEGALLY LEAVING a situation in which they are not legally being detained. It takes maybe a week of any kind of actual law enforcement training to understand that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES do you ever place yourself in front of a vehicle in 'drive.' That agent had every single opportunity to simply take two steps to the right and not be standing directly in front of a vehicle attempting to conduct their legal right to drive away.
"You can see the wheels are turned, [Renee] backed up and turned them to the right, moved forward a bit to leave, couldn't because an agent was standing in front of her, and continued to try to leave by TURNING HER WHEELS TO THE RIGHT and moving forward. He continually chose to stand there and not allow her to legally leave as she had every single right to do.
The officer pulling on her door and banging on her window and swearing at her had ZERO authority to order her out of her vehicle or attempt to make entry into her vehicle. NONE. A single day of actual training of the legal scope of authority and the LAW would've prevented that from happening.
"You now have a frightened citizen being blockaded by immigration agents (with another person in her vehicle) who had zero obligation to follow legally invalid orders from that agent, being blocked in and having a fully grown, masked man attempting to make entry into her car. If this were reversed, every single person would immediately feel she had every reasonable expectation to fear for her safety. It doesn't matter if she knew it was ICE because the agents weren't even acting in their scope of authority anyway.
"Whether or not she made the right decision by very CLEARLY- based off of how hard her wheels were turned and how low and to the driver corner windshield that shot was fired- trying to drive to the left of that agent is IRRELEVANT in the picture as a whole.
None of this would have happened if those agents had done even one single thing correctly. Not just correctly, but within their legal scope of authority. Every single moment of that interaction was escalated by untrained, unprofessional, procedurally inept "agents" who not only had zero control of themselves but everything around them. And not because they are helpless, but because their actions that did not fall under their scope of power CAUSED this. Their tempers, lack of training, and the knowledge that they can get away with violating their own scope of authority caused this.
"I will always be the first to defend law enforcement when lethal force very clearly is required. But this was not even remotely the case, and as an actual TRAINED professional in that field with experience and understanding of both the law and procedures, there is no justification for this- and it would benefit EVERYONE to actually read up on the laws, scope of authority, and use a single shred of common sense to see that this situation was started, escalated, and caused by the ICE agents involved. I have zero respect for those in power who are ignorant of the scope of their authority and abuse it at the cost of lives around them.