[mafarrico]

Parafraseando o que eu ouvi da boca do Assad foi isto - Não vamos falar sobre armas químicas porque é um assunto de segurança interna.

Quem diz que o regime de assad jurava a pés juntos que não tinha armas quimicas a única coisa que pode fazer para não passar por mentiroso é indicar as fontes onde tais afirmações se encontram. Fontes oficiais e fidedignas de preferencia , ou seja, areamilitar não conta.

Sobre as armas de destruição maciça do iraque o que podemos dizer é que há pessoas que aindam acreditam que o Elvis Presley está vivo.

(ia-me esquecendo, aproveitem e perguntem também aos israelitas sobre o seu arsenal químico.)

[Pellegrino Ernetti]

.... Agora sabemos todos que não havia armas de destruição maciça.

Considerando a verdade dos factos, o que podemos dizer não é que não havia armas de destruição maciça.

O que podemos dizer é que nunca foram encontradas armas de destruição maciça.
O que é algo muito, muito diferente.

Lembro que a Siria também jurava a pés juntos que não tinha armas químicas...
Desde o tempo do Bush, que protestava nas Nações Unidas afirmando que não as tinha.

As que agora entregou, eram afinal bombas de águarás.

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  

Felizmente, o ridículo não mata...!

[Edu]

(ia-me esquecendo, aproveitem e perguntem também aos israelitas sobre o seu arsenal químico.)

Ou melhor ainda, pelo arsenal nuclear.

[Cabeça de Martelo]

Concluído acordo sobre a união bancária na UE

Parlamento Europeu e os estados da União Europeia (UE) alcançaram hoje um acordo sobre a união bancária, depois de uma noite de negociações, anunciou o grupo PPE (direita) num comunicado.
Este acordo político refere-se à liquidação ordenada de bancos da zona euro e tem como objetivo fazer com que o fardo financeiro caia sobre o setor bancário e não sobre os contribuintes.

"Foi encontrado um acordo hoje de manhã cedo, depois de 16 horas de negociações", indicou o grupo PPE num comunicado.

A liquidação de bancos é o segundo pilar da união bancária, depois da supervisão única de bancos da zona euro, que será assegurada a partir do final deste ano pelo Banco Central Europeu (BCE).

Este acordo alcançado depois de grandes lutas representa "uma proteção real contra as falências bancárias", explicou hoje o ministro das Finanças francês, Pierre Moscovici.

O acordo político surgiu poucas horas antes do início de uma cimeira de chefes de Estado e de governo dos 28 em Bruxelas e no limite do prazo para poder ser aprovado pelo Parlamento Europeu em meados de abril, na última sessão plenária da legislatura.

Caso o prazo não tivesse sido respeitado, o conjunto do texto teria de ser renegociado com a próxima composição do Parlamento, implicando uma grande perda de tempo na adoção da união bancária.

Um compromisso entre os estados já tinha sido difícil em dezembro devido à intransigência da Alemanha, cujas posições se mantiveram até ao fim muito longe das do Parlamento.

Os pontos de fricção referiam-se, em particular, ao mecanismo da tomada de decisão e ao ritmo do crescente poder do fundo que será adotado e constituído pelos bancos para acompanhar as falências do setor.

MC // ATR

Lusa, publicado por Patrícia Viegas
publicado a 2014-03-20 às 10:59

Como diz a minha mulher quando a minha filha faz birra:

- Quem manda?

- Os Pais (Alemanha).

[vmpsm]

"Os idosos não produzem e são fonte de despesa"

Esta sexta-feira, o site do Expresso publica o último excerto dos dois novos livros de Maria Filomena Mónica, que olham para o interior de uma sala de aula. Amanhã, há entrevista na "Atual".

Maria Filomena Mónica pediu a oito professoras e quatro alunas que a ajudassem a espreitar pelo buraco da fechadura para dentro de uma sala da aula. Daqui resultaram dois livros: "A Sala de Aula", análise da socióloga a partir do material que lhe foi chegando às mãos, e "Diários de Uma Sala de Aula", edição da coleção dos diários que as professoras, alunas e também uma mãe foram escrevendo. As duas obras foram lançadas ontem no Centro Cultural de Belém, pela Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Amanhã publicamos, na edição do suplemento "Atual", uma entrevista com a socióloga. Hoje, avançamos uma passagem do diário de uma das professoras.

EXCERTO:

"Se, por um lado, elogiavam e enalteciam os avanços da ciência, o esforço de médicos e cientistas para prolongar com qualidade a vida humana, por outro, consideravam que, em termos económicos, isto constituía uma fatalidade. Segundo as suas palavras, os "idosos" não produzem e são fonte de despesa porque necessitam de cuidados médicos contínuos. Acrescendo o facto de se verificar um enorme desvio de verbas do orçamento geral do Estado para as suas reformas, talvez a morte fosse a melhor solução para todos aqueles que sentem que já não são úteis para a sociedade a que pertencem. Em suma, os idosos contribuíam, decisivamente, para a falência do sistema de Segurança Social. De acordo com os pontos de vista enunciados, também não parecia justo deixar viver quem já não encontrava um sentido para a sua própria existência, reconhecendo a sua perda de capacidades. A maior parte dos idosos que conheciam eram pessoas deprimidas. Porquê viver com semelhante angústia? Confessei que não esperava tanta insensibilidade. Compreendia que nesta fase das suas vidas, plena de força e de sonhos, seria difícil conceber uma existência diferente. Perguntei-lhes se, em algum momento, tinham imaginado o seu próprio futuro. Como seria a sua vida em 2072? Estariam preparados para aceitar, estoicamente, a morte?

"Quem pensa nisso, professora? Não se tem esses pensamentos aos 17 anos" - sentenciou o Daniel. A Maria reconheceu que talvez houvesse alguma frieza, um pouco de crueldade no tratamento da temática. Mas esta era a verdade partilhada por todos. Era do conhecimento geral que a maior parte das famílias coloca os avós num lar, onde quase nunca os vão visitar. Para quê viver assim, à espera da morte? Ela preferia não vir a conhecer essa realidade. Viver com pouca qualidade de vida não lhe parecia justo. Havia toda uma sorte de doenças motivadas por estados de demência, que nenhum ser humano merece conhecer por experiência própria. A ciência deve ajudá-los a morrer com dignidade... Meu Deus, e é a Maria uma forte candidata a Medicina. A Daniela achou que eu tinha reagido negativamente aos argumentos apresentados porque, aos 50 anos, eu também já estava muito perto de atingir os anos dourados da terceira idade."

Catarina, professora, em ""Diários de Uma Sala de Aula" (Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2014)"

http://expresso.sapo.pt/os-idosos-nao-produzem-e-sao-fonte-de-despesa=f861802

[Luso]

Lá estão eles a começar a vender a eutanásia!
Vindo do Expresso não é de espantar.
Essas "modas", podem chegar mais tarde aqui, mas acabam por chegar.
Brevemente teremos os do costume (BE) a lançar o "amplo debate sobre o tema".
Que curiosamente e por "coincidência" também serve aos neoliberais do Expresso e aos amigos do dono.

[Edu]

Não sabia bem onde colocar este, mas fica aqui.

O Manuel Monteiro é talvez um dos únicos políticos portugueses que não se deixou vender, e por isso foi afastado da política.

[Cabeça de Martelo]

Eu tenho saudades do CDS desses tempos... depois o tipo colocou o Paulinho das feiras no partido e foi o que foi!

[Luso]

Atenção aos preconceitos e à propaganda a que estamos sujeitos...

http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political ... nter.shtml

Political Information
What do Jewish supremacists say about us Gentiles?
 By Streicher's Ghost
 Sep 11, 2013 - 4:58:16 AM


Well, it’s a trick, we always use it. When from Europe somebody is criticizing Israel, then we bring up the Holocaust. When in this country people are criticizing Israel, then they are anti-Semitic. And the [Jewish] organization is strong, and has a lot of money, and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong and they are strong in this country, as you know. And they have power, which is OK. They are talented people and they have power and money, and the media and other things, and their attitude is ‘Israel, my country right or wrong,’ identification. And they are not ready to hear criticism. And it’s very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts of the Israeli government as anti-Semitic, and to bring up the Holocaust, and the suffering of the Jewish people, and that is justify everything we do to the Palestinians.

Shulamit Aloni, former Israeli minister, Democracy Now, August 14, 2002

**************


Gene Simmons says gentiles are for manual labor

"That's what gentiles are for." - Gene Simmons (born Chaim Witz in Haifa, Israel)

This 50" video clip was published by NowSwimBack14 on May 22, 2011: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEbhdNJq ... bedded#t=0

Publisher's comments:

Gene Simmons (born Chaim Witz in Haifa, Israel) expresses the Jewish opinion of Gentiles (non-Jews).

******************


The Jew … Judaizes … he provokes religious indifference, but he also imposes on those whose faith he destroys, his own concept of the world, of morality, and of human life … The Jews detests the spirit of the nation in the midst of which they live.

Bernard Lazare, in Antisemitism


We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.

Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles (1924)


Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.

Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created.

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Jerusalem Post, october 10, 2010. Yosef is the former Sephardi Chief Rabbi in the Jewish state, and currently the spiritual leader of the Knesset party Shas. He is known to be an important authority on Jewish law.


If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA.

If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Jewish Week, april 26, 1996


Any trial based on the assumption that Jews and goyim are equal is a total travesty of justice.

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, June 6, 1989


Here in the Land of Israel, an Arab hos no right to exist. [The Jewish terrorist Baruch] Goldstein’s deed [killing 29 Muslims] constitutes a fulfillment of a number of com-mandments of Jewish law…[including] taking revenge on non-Jews.

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ha’aretz, Israel, Nov. 05, 2003


I am sorry not only about dead Arabs but also about dead flies.

Rabbi Moshe Levinger, cited in Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel by Israel Shahak


The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews–all of them in all different levels–is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.

Rabbi Avraham Yitzhak Kook, once Chief Rabbi in Palestine, cited in Shahak, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel


Kill [even] the good among the Gentiles.

Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai, quoted in Mechilta Midrash


The white race is the cancer of human history.

Susan Sontag (Rosenblatt), Partisan Review, Winter 1967


Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.

The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.

We intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed, not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.

Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Magazine, Sep-Oct 2002


Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.

Yitzhak Attia, Israel Magazine, april 2003


Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews? But that’s not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.

The time has come, though. We no longer have to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country.

Manny Friedman, Times of Israel, july 1, 2012


Jews totally run Hollywood.

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish. As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.

But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times, december 19, 2008


Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him.

Maimonides, in Mishnah Torah


Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Their material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews.

Schneur Zalman of Liadi, founder of Chabad-Lubavitch


The body of a Jewish person, is of a totally different quality from the body of members of all other nations of the world. Bodies of the Gentiles are in vain. An even greater difference is in regard to the soul. A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.

Mendel Schneerson, influential Chabad rabbi


A Jew is intrinsically good.  A Jew is a part of God above.  Even if at times he strays it is not because he has become evil.  It is only that there is evil within him that he has to cleanse. However, to separate with a million degrees of separation, a Gentile is an impure thing.  The entire essence of the Gentile is evil and impure.  Even if he occasionally does good deeds he does not thereby become good.  As the Holy Light of Life says regarding Gentiles, even such a one who is very careful in his actions does not obtain any degree of holiness thereby.

As is also well known, even educated Gentiles who guarded themselves because of their clear understanding of what is right, nonetheless failed when they were tested, because a Gentile has no power for goodness within him.

On the contrary, the evil thoughts of Gentiles contaminate the world’s atmosphere and create ordeals for Jewish children. As the Remnant for Pinchos says, the thoughts of Gentiles, even when they are dead, still linger in and contaminate the atmosphere.

He says that to be protected from this there is only one solution: to completely despise the thoughts of Gentiles and to realize that all their thoughts are only evil.  Consequently, Gentiles, whose thoughts bring upon us ordeals, may be hated.

The nature of the righteous ones is to hate Gentiles.

A Gentile is impure, as we have mentioned, and he defiles one who speaks to him and this brings evil upon a person.

No one wants to become connected to a Gentile, God forbid.

Certainly, beyond any doubt, a Gentile whose whole nature is essentially evil, looking at his appearance is defiling.

Gentiles are referred to as “wicked waters” while Jews are akin to fire.

Yalkut Shaiylos u’Teshuvos


Germans are not human beings. Henceforth the word German means to us the most terrible curse. From now on the word German will trigger your rifle. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day. …

If you kill one German, kill another – there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days; do not count miles. Count only the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the German – this is your old mother’s prayer. Kill the German – this is what your children beseech you to do. Kill the German – this is the cry of your Russian earth. Do not waver. Do not let up. Kill.

Ilya Ehrenburg, Soviet Jewish journalist, Vojna (1942-43)


Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here. It is not sufficient that you should buy no goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who patronises German ships or shipping…. we will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.

Samuel Untermyer, Radio Broadcast on WABC, New York, August 6, 1933


I believe, that the Jews have a mission in life. They must see to it that the nations of the world get together in one vast federation. ‘Union Now’ is the beginning of this. Slowly but surely the world will develop into a paradise. We will have perpetual peace. And the Jews will do the most to bring about this confederation, because they have the most to gain. But how can you get peace if Germany exists?

Theodor Kaufman, The Canadian Jewish Chronicle, September 26, 1941, p.5


The Jews know we’re better than everyone else. We’re the chosen people.

James Deen, porn actor, Forward, February 12, 2013


What is the object of the Jew’s worship in this world? Usury. What is his worldly god? Money.

Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question


Like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves.

Stephen Steinlight, The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography, October 2001


There must be no assimilation. We are a peculiar people, and a peculiar people we must remain.

Basil M Henriques, South African “Zionist Record” January 29, 1939


Europe thinks as Jews; all her society is Jewish or is controlled by Jews…. There is no program, no idea or conviction a European has that is his own— they all come from the Jews.

Samuel Roth, New York 1927


Why should the Arabs make peace? If I were an Arab leader, I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? There has been anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we came here and stole their country. Why should they accept that?

David Ben-Gurion


The whole history of American Jewry is a tribute to the power of Jewish nepotism.

Adam Bellows


There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.

Wesley Clark, retired General who commanded Operation Allied Force in the Kosovo War


The strengthening of multicultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would be more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.

Miriam Faine, editor of Australian Jewish Democrat


The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible …


Earl Raab. Writer, previously Executive Director of the Jewish Community Relations Council


The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendent quality.

Ben Wattenberg, writer and journalist


Some time in the distant future, brown people are probably going to — and I say this without judgment — breed their way to power in both Europe and America. Arab populations are growing in countries like France and Holland, and I think we all see where this Mexican thing is going in America. That’s right, because they fuck more, the darker skinned people are going to rule the world, and white people, for their own self-preservation, should get a start on being nice to them now! Nice!

Bill Maher, author, TV host, “comedian”


American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.

Charles Silberman, writer and journalist


… historically, Jews had always thrived in nations and empires with multicultural, pluralistic and tolerant environments, while they fared badly in strong ethnic or nationalistic societies. European Jews have always been the emblematic stranger or ‘other’. Therefore, by definition, a society where the stranger is welcome is good for the Jews, although they have not always appreciated this link. … The future of European Jewry is dependant on our ability to shape a multicultural, pluralistic and diverse society.

Göran Rosenberg, author and journalist


I think there’s a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re gonna be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Barbara Spectre, director the Jewish organization Paideia

[mafarrico]

Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too

Thursday, 03 April 2014 04:16    Brandon Smith

Numerous cultures have had holidays dedicated to the celebration of pulling the wool over the eyes of others, from the ancient Romans, to early Muslims, to medieval Christians, to Americans and Europeans today. As April begins, we once again turn a mischievous eye to the concept of the fool and, as always, each person seeks to be the prankster and never the victim.

Unfortunately, even the most vigilant of Americans can sometimes be led astray by a clever ruse, and I believe this is taking place today in the Liberty Movement’s perception of the rising “tensions” between Russia and the West.

In my article Ukraine Crisis: Just Another Globalist-Engineered Powder Keg, I outlined the history of false paradigms and engineered conflicts between numerous nations, including how these conflicts are exploited by global money interests to consolidate and centralize social and political power. The birth of communist Russia, in particular, was directly funded by Western banks and supported with arms and military aid from the U.S. government itself. These sorts of startling facts are not taught in schools and universities exactly because the continued dominance of the money elite relies on continued misrepresentations of legitimate history.

Many in the Liberty Movement have studied and are well aware of the central banking cabal and its stranglehold on the U.S. and Europe. But strangely, some people refuse to acknowledge the substantial possibility that global bankers are also in control of Russia and are playing both sides of the burgeoning economic war.

As the Ukrainian crisis festers and other dangers in the Pacific and the Mideast grow, an odd consensus among alternative analysts is taking hold — namely the belief that President Vladimir Putin and Russia represent some kind of opposition to globalization and the rule of corporate financiers. Perhaps moments in Putin’s rhetoric and the existence of media outlets like RT have seduced elements of the Liberty Movement into assuming that Russia is a “victim” in the grand schemes of Western oligarchy and that Russia is truly the "white knight", the underdog willing to stand up against the New World Order. I’m sorry to say that nothing could be further from the truth.

Russia is just as much a tool of the global elite today as it was after the Bolshevik Revolution, and Vladimir Putin is just as much a socialist puppet as Barack Obama. Let’s start from the beginning of the rebirth of Russia as a regional federation in the 1990s after the fall of the Warsaw Pact.

Mikhail Gorbachev, the leader largely credited with the ultimate dismantling of the Soviet Union and the rise of the “new” Russia, has long been a proponent of the “New World Order” (his words) and centralized global government. In an address entitled “Perspectives On Global Change” to the students of Lafayette College in Easton, Penn., Gorbachev argued that such a solution was necessary to safeguard “freedom.”

“The opportunities that existed after the end of the Cold War… were not used properly. At that same time, we saw that the entire world situation did not develop positively. We saw deterioration where there should have been positive movement toward a new world order.”

He continued:

“But we still are facing the problem of building such a world order. We have crises: we are facing problems of the environment, of backwardness and poverty, of food shortages. All of these problems are because we do not have a system of global governance.”

When asked in 1995 by San Francisco Weekly what Gorbachev meant by the phrase “New World Order,” Jim Garrison, the executive director of the Gorbachev Foundation stated, bluntly that Gorbachev wanted nothing less than global government.

"Over the next 20 to 30 years, we are going to end up with world government. … It’s inevitable. It will happen and become just as normal to have a relationship with the rest of the world as we now have, say, if you are a Californian and you go to Vermont."

Take note that it has now been almost 20 years since Garrison's assertion and the motions towards a global currency are picking up great speed.  Gorbachev saw global government being achieved through international organizations like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. But, is this vision of the New World Order limited only to Gorbachev and his inner circle? At the Gorbachev-led State of the World Forum in 1995, Council On Foreign Relations member Zbigniew Brzezinski had this to say:

“We do not have a New World Order. … We cannot leap into world government in one quick step. … In brief, the precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.”

In Zbigniew K. Brzezinski’s book Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era, he elaborates on the ideology behind what brand of government the New World Order would be:

"The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty… More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken."

"National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept… Marxism represents a further vital and creative state in the maturing of man’s universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief…"

Brzezinski seems to be in total agreement with Gorbachev, but why should anyone care what Brzezinski thinks about the future of American sovereignty? Perhaps it’s because he is a close and influential foreign policy adviser to Obama.

So we have now established that political interests on both sides since the 1990s have called for a New World Order and global government taking a decidedly socialist or Marxist form. Some people might applaud this kind of future, or they might despise it; but the fact remains that this plan is indeed being openly promoted and implemented by government officials and elitists in the East and the West. It is undeniable.

From its very inception, the new Russia was designed to become a catalyst for global governance, but global governance by whom? As they say, always follow the money.

Russia is more beholden to international bankers than perhaps any nation on the planet. After the collapse of the Russian economy and the dissolution of the old Soviet Union, the country was in dire straits. From 1992 to 1996, the IMF intervened in the Russian economy, offering more than $22 billion in aid (officially). This first loan package was presented as a failure when Russia defaulted on its debts, and loans from the IMF restarted through the late ’90s until this very day.

Many people are aware of the IMF involvement in Russia, but few know about the scandal surrounding where those IMF funds specifically went. In 1999, information was made public on the diversion of IMF cash into the coffers of Russian corporate elites, politicians, and even mobsters. This money was supposed to go toward the rebuilding of Russian infrastructure and economy. Instead, the aristocracy and criminal underworld were receiving a large cut of the funds.

The money was diverted and laundered through the Bank of New York, an institution founded in 1784 by none other than internationalist agent and central bank promoter Alexander Hamilton. The bank changed ownership through merger in 2007 and is now called The Bank Of New York Mellon.

The IMF’s first response to the scandal was to divert blame, stating that it had no control over the cash once it was in the hands of the Central Bank of Russia (CBR). After continued revelations on funds being misused or disappearing altogether, the IMF commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers to audit the CBR. The results of that audit have never been made public. However, in 1999 the Russian government admitted that it had hidden more than $50 billion offshore in a subsidiary bank in the Channel Islands. Part of this money came from IMF bailouts. The former chairman of the CBR, Sergey Dubinin, insisted that the IMF was fully aware of who the funds were going to.

Numerous officials from the chief state auditor to the minister of internal security to the prosecutor general of Russia had come forward with information that corroborated evidence that IMF money was being distributed to the wrong people. The chairman of the Duma Committee on Security stated that some of the IMF loans never made it to Russia. Rather, the money was pumped into the secret foreign accounts of Russia’s highest officials.

Despite all of the admissions and evidence, IMF auditors refused to cite any corruption or malfeasance during their investigations. One would think that they would do everything in their power to find out where their funds went and why. The reason for the cover-up is obvious: The IMF knew exactly who the money was going to. The first bailouts of Russia were designed to buy the cooperation of the Russian political and corporate elite and ensure that the future direction of the nation would follow the globalist plan.

Fast-forward to the present. Putin continues the subversive relationship between Russia and the IMF. In 2009, Putin called for the creation of a “super reserve currency” under the control of the IMF and using the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights basket as a foundation.

Why would Putin, a supposedly anti-globalist nationalist leader, want the IMF, a supposedly U.S.-controlled institution, to be the global purveyor and overlord of the world economy? It’s because the IMF is not a U.S.-controlled institution; it is a banker-controlled institution. And Putin is a globalist, not a nationalist.

The recent break of Crimea from Ukraine and secession to Russia was partly instigated by the vast concessions required by the IMF if loans to Ukraine were to move forward. One of these concessions included the handing over of Ukrainian gas pipelines to America’s Chevron. Crimean leaders accused Kiev politicians of selling out Ukraine to the global bankers.

However, it was actually Russia’s finance minister and Putin who first pushed for the IMF bailout of Ukraine. It was, in fact, Putin who wanted Ukraine to “sell out” to Western financiers.

Russia’s central bank is also a member of the Bank of International Settlements, the good-old-boys club of the international banking world. The BIS was founded in 1930 and served as the focal point of globalization until after World War II, when evidence arose that the organization had helped the Nazis by funding the German war machine, laundering money for Gestapo officials and hiding funds looted from Europe by the Third Reich.

Due to the scandal, the BIS took a back seat to the IMF and World Bank; but it still exists today. Carroll Quigley, Council on Foreign Relations member, elitist insider and mentor to Bill Clinton, had this to say about the BIS in his book Tragedy And Hope:

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

Putin has been elevated to heroic status in much of the mainstream media over the years. TIME magazine, a long-running globalist publication, recently published a front-page article with this tagline: “America’s weak and waffling. Russia’s rich and resurgent — and its leader doesn’t care what anybody thinks of him.”

This cover was used by TIME in every country in which it is distributed, except the United States.

The Times of Britain named Putin “Man Of The Year” in 2013. In Liberty Movement circles, Putin worship has been growing to disturbing levels. I would say at least half of our movement truly believes Putin and Russia to be a guiding light in the fight against globalization and the New World Order. Unfortunately, many people look for heroes to save them when they should be looking to themselves. Putin’s nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize for his “intervention” in the Syrian crisis is celebrated by many freedom fighters here in America, when, in reality, the Obama Administration’s failure to achieve a war footing in the region had nothing to do with the actions of Russia.

Remember, Russia and the U.S. are nothing but false champions dueling in a fake gladiator match paid for by the IMF. The war against Syria was thwarted because the elites were unable to garner enough public support from the American people to make the action viable. Every engineered war needs a gullible percentage of the population to give it momentum. Why didn’t they get their following from the public? It was because of the tireless efforts of the alternative media.

It was the Liberty Movement that exposed the lies behind the Syrian insurgency; the consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya; the CIA’s involvement with al-Qaida in Damascus, etc. It is the Liberty Movement that deserves the credit for disrupting the globalist plan to use Syria as a trigger event for a false confrontation between the U.S. and Russia. Yet many are cheering the elitist puppet Putin while he takes credit for our accomplishments.

The most frightening aspect of the false paradigm between East and West is the potential it creates for the co-option of liberty proponents here in America. If we allow ourselves to be suckered into cheerleading for Russia, or any controlled government for that matter, then we have lost. We will be swallowed up in the tides of war, while supporting false prophets and artificial protagonists. Our mission, the mission for a truly free and sovereign America, will be lost in the confusion and chaos of the global chess game. It is time to accept that the fate of this country and perhaps the future of human freedom rest solely on the shoulders of the resistance here at home. There is no nation out there in the ether of central banking that is going to help us. The sooner we come to terms with the reality that we are on our own, the stronger we will be when the fight begins.

 

[Cabeça de Martelo]

[mafarrico]

[Cabeça de Martelo]

Testing Theories of American Politics : Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens / Martin Gilens ; Princeton University

http://www.princeton.edu/~mgilens/Gilen ... 3-7-14.pdf

[PereiraMarques]

Artigo interessante, mas que apenas constata o "óbvio", i.e. o que já tina sido notado por C. Wright Mills e outros autores "elitistas"...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_Elite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite_theory

[FoxTroop]

Austrália rejeita hipótese de destroços de avião desaparecido no golfo de Bengala

A Austrália rejeitou hoje as alegações de uma empresa de exploração marinha segundo a qual destroços detetados no golfo de Bengala possam ser provenientes do Boeing 777 da Malaysia Airlines.

http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/especiais/voomh370/2014-04-30-australia-rejeita-hipotese-de-destrocos-de-aviao-desaparecido-no-golfo-de-bengala

Não analisa, não verifica, nem sequer vê, limita-se a dizer que não pode ser porque.......não pode. Cheirava mal, continua a cheirar e cada vez mais, e está a ser giro como a noticia mal passou ontem nos espaços do costume e hoje nem sequer é falada.