Cingapura acolhe manobras navais contra terrorismo e pirataria
17/05 - 02:43 - EFE
ImprimirEnviar por e-mailComentarCorrigirMinha notíciaFale ConoscoManila, 17 mai (EFE).- Mais de 3 mil marinheiros e pilotos, 18 naves de guerra e vários navios de patrulha e helicópteros de 19 países realizarão exercícios navais conjuntos contra o terrorismo e a pirataria perto do litoral de Cingapura.
O objetivo das manobras, que começarão no sábado, é coordenar os esforços para lutar de forma mais eficaz contra as ameaças do terrorismo e da pirataria numa das rotas marítimas mais perigosas do mundo, informa hoje o jornal "The Straits Times".
Estados Unidos, China, Austrália, França e Indonésia estão entre os participantes. Marinheiros da Índia, Bangladesh e Peru também estarão presentes como observadores.
Os exercícios coincidem com a edição 2007 da feira de indústrias de defesa Imdex Asia. Fabricantes de armas exporão seus produtos a representantes das Forças Armadas de todo o mundo.
A China, presente nas manobras com 78 submarinos, sete deles nucleares, deve adquirir pelo menos outros 30 convencionais e cinco atômicos, formando assim a frota mais poderosa da região.
Segundo o jornal, na reunião serão assinados contratos de defesa no valor de US$ 55 bilhões.
O local das manobras é a Península de Malaca, por onde transita quase um terço do comércio mundial. Ela liga o Oceano Índico ao Pacífico.
O braço de mar sofre a cada ano ataques de piratas, e é considerado também um alvo potencial de ataques terroristas da Jemaah Islamiya, ligada à rede Al Qaeda. EFE csm mf
A China, presente nas manobras com 78 submarinos, sete deles nucleares, deve adquirir pelo menos outros 30 convencionais e cinco atômicos, formando assim a frota mais poderosa da região.
‘Two patrols’ by China’s subs
China’s submarine fleet of 82 submarines is reported to have conducted only two patrols
last year.
The claim was made by the American Federation of Scientists using US Navy declassified
information. The Type 092 ballistic missile submarine Xia is reported never to have made a
patrol.
The federation claims that since 1981, the first year for which data is available, the Chinese
submarine force (whose strength has dropped from 120 hulls) has averaged less than two
patrols a year and in four years including 2005 not made any patrols. The greatest activity
was in 2000 when there were six patrols and the federation implies these were in response
to US submarine operations.
The scientists conclude that Chinese submarine crews appear to have relatively little
operational experience making it difficult to operate their boats safely and competently. It
suggests that the tactical skills may be limited and that the submarine force remains
essentially for coastal defence.
ARMAMENTISMO
Arsenal chinês preocupa Estados Unidos
Uma das preocupações em Washington é com mísseis balísticos intercontinentais chineses, tendo raio de ação capaz de atingir os EUA. Cinco novos submarinos poderão transportar mísseis de longo alcance. O armamentismo inclui arma capaz de atacar os satélites em órbita baixa
26/05/2007 03:58
O Departamento de Defesa norte-americano (Pentágono) está preocupado com o poder militar crescente da China, principalmente com seus mísseis balísticos intercontinentais (ICBM) e com a falta de transparência das autoridades em Pequim sobre suas despesas militares. A estratégia militar dos chineses "sai das dimensões terrestres, aéreas e marítimas para entrar no campo de batalha moderno e no ciberespaço".
É o que revela um relatório anual entregue ontem ao Congresso, em Washington. O Pentágono está particularmente preocupado com o desenvolvimento chinês de novos ICBMs DF-31A capazes de atingir os Estados Unidos e com métodos "para bloquear os sistemas de defesa antimísseis". Os norte-americanos estão, justamente, desenvolvendo um escudo antímísseis.
O dossiê também mencionou a construção pelos chineses de cinco novos submarinos da classe Jin, equipados para transportar mísseis de longo alcance de nova geração. Os militares norte- americanos também citaram o teste de uma arma anti-satélite em janeiro, que "mostra a capacidade da China de atacar satélites que giram sob órbita baixa em volta da Terra".
Em fevereiro, no Congresso, o secretário de Defesa, Robert Gates, havia expressado sua preocupação. De acordo com o Pentágono, "a expansão das capacidades militares das Forças Armadas chinesas é um fator crucial na modificação dos equilíbrios no Leste da Ásia e o aumento das capacidades estratégicas da China tem repercussões muito além da região Ásia-Pacífico".
Como no ano passado, o relatório conclui que se Taiwan parece ser o objetivo a curto prazo das despesas militares da China, estas representam uma ameaça potencial para os EUA a longo prazo. (das agências de notícias)
Nuclear carrier for China?
China’s Navy is likely to be the major beneficiary of a 17.8% increase
in the defence budget although it is unclear whether this will be translated
into improved effectiveness.
The Chinese are currently
building two Luzhou (Type 051C)
class destroyers, four Jiangkai
(Type 054) class frigates, a Type
071 amphibious assault ship as
well as submarines and smaller
surface combatants. Beijing is also
interested in aircraft carriers and
press reports talk of plans for a
93,000 ton, nuclear-powered ship
supposedly called Type 085 and a
conventionally-powered 48,000
ton Type 089.
Considerable scepticism has
been expressed about these reports
which spoke of the ‘Type 085’
being completed by 2020.
However, it is known that China
is seeking to develop air
independent propulsion
submarines using Stirling engine
technology and reports that one has
been installed in a Yuan (Type 041)
class submarine.
Yet the capability of the Chinese
Navy remains in doubt with most
of the submarine force confined to
short training patrols within
coastal waters (Naval Spyglass Vol
3 No 8). The Xia (Type 092) class
ballistic missile submarine appears
never to have made a seagoing
patrol in the 20 years it has been
in service.
Google Earth captura imagem de novo submarino nuclear de guerra da China
De acordo com pesquisadores da Federação Americana de Cientistas, a ferramenta do Google conseguiu imagem rara.
Por COMPUTERWORLD
09 de julho de 2007 - 10h01
O Google Earth está oferecendo uma rara imagem do novo submarino nuclear de guerra chinês. De acordo com a Federação Americana de Cientistas, a fotografia foi tirada pelo satélite comercial Quickbird no final de 2006. Mais informações no blog de assuntos de segurança da entidade.
Hans Kristensen, autor do post, afirma que o submarino é de classe Jin vessel, um dos cinco que a China espera construir. Ao comparar a imagem do Google Earth com fotografias de outros submarinos chineses, Kristensen comentou algumas das novas capacidades.
”O Jin-class tem aproximadamente 10 metros de comprimento a mais do que os [submarinos] Xia-class, principalmente por uma extensão na seção do meio de aproximadamente 35 metros que hospeda os tubos de lançamento de mísseis parte do compartimento do reator”, escreveu Kristensen. No entanto, a imagem não revela se os submarinos classe Jin possuem tubos para 12 ou 16 mísseis nucleares.
New Chinese Ballistic Missile Submarine Spotted
By Hans M. Kristensen
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fas.org%2Fblog%2Fssp%2Fimages%2Fssbn.jpg&hash=525339132eb1f6307746959e74292711)
A new satellite image appears to have captured China's new ballistic missile submarine. Coordinates: 38°49'4.40"N, 121°29'39.82"E.
A commercial satellite image appears to have captured China's new nuclear ballistic missile submarine. The new class, known as the Jin-class or Type 094, is expected to replace the unsuccessful Xia-class (Type 092) of a single boat built in the early 1980s.
The new submarine was photographed by the commercial Quickbird satellite in late 2006 and the image is freely available on the Google Earth web site.
A Comparison of SSBN Dimensions
Two satellite images are now available (see figure below) that clearly show two missile submarines with different dimensions. One image from 2005 shows what is believed to be the Xia-class (Type 092) SSBN in drydock at the Jianggezhuang Submarine Base approximately 14 miles east of Qingdao. The submarine is approximately 390 feet (120 meters) long of which the missile compartment makes up roughly 80 feet (25 meters). Twelve missile launch tubes are clearly visible.
The second image from late 2006 shows what appears to be the new Jin-class (Type 094) SSBN moored at the Xiaopingdao Submarine Base south of Dalian, approximately 193 miles north of Qingdao. The Jin-class appears to be approximately 35 feet (10 meters) longer than the Xia-class SSBN, primarily due to an extended mid-section of approximately 115 feet (35 meters) that houses the missile launch tubes and part of the reactor compartment.
Xia- and Jin-Class SSBN Comparison
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fas.org%2Fblog%2Fssp%2Fimages%2Fssbncompare.jpg&hash=11fce4f663ad2c75b5d998ba33c84439)
These two commercial satellite images of the old Xia-class SSBN (top) and the new Jin-class SSBN show the different major compartments. The Jin-class appears to be approximately 35 feet (10 meters) longer with an extended missile compartment. Both images view the submarines from a "eye-altitude" of approximately 500 feet (152 meters).
The extended missile compartment of the Jin-class seems seems intended to accommodate the Julang-2 sea-launched ballistic missile, which is larger than the Julang-1 deployed on the Xia-class. Part of the extension may also be related to the size of the reactor compartment. The U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence estimated in 2004 that the Jin-class, like the Xia-class, will have 12 missiles launch tubes (see figure below). Other non-governmental sources frequently claim the submarine will have 16 tubes. The satellite image is not of high enough resolution to show the hatches to the missile launch tubes
Estimated Jin-Class SSBN Layout
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fas.org%2Fblog%2Fssp%2Fimages%2Fssbnoni.jpg&hash=82dc76a8c6ef93c6b1ba284e0e3e25fc)
The U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence estimated in 2004 (bottom) that the Jin-class SSBN would have 12 missiles
The U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence estimated in December 2006 that China might build five Jin-class SSBNs. The estimate has been widely cited by non-governmental institutes and some news media as a fact, but the Pentagon's annual report on China's military forces from May 2007 did not repeat the estimate.
Parada para assinalar 60 anos da Marinha
China vai mostrar submarinos nucleares pela primeira vez
21.04.2009 - 22h17
http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/notic ... idCanal=11 (http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1375764&idCanal=11)
China ready to build aircraft carrier
Hong Kong, China — Shipbuilding experts from Eastern Europe have confirmed that China will start to build its own aircraft carrier this year, as preparations for the project are complete.
The experts had visited the No. 3 military dock of the Changxing Island Shipyard – the new location of the Jiangnan Shipyard, known as the cradle of China’s defense industry – based in Shanghai, where they acquired exclusive photos of the interior of the shipyard. From these it can be deduced that China is ready to commence building the aircraft carrier at this dock.
Chinese armed police have dramatically strengthened their watch on Dock No. 3. All the entrances to and exits from this dock are under armed police guard, with plainclothes police on patrol. In contrast, the entrances to Dock No. 1, where civilian ships are built, are guarded only by shipyard security staff.
Dock No. 3 is 580 meters long, 120 meters wide, and completely encircled by a wall at least 2.5 meters high. A giant gantry crane has been built, with a capacity to lift at least 600 tons. The dock is large enough to build a medium-sized conventional aircraft carrier similar to the Russian Admiral Kuznetsov class with a light load displacement of about 50,000 tons.
The outfitting quay for No. 3 Dock has been finished and includes a large gantry crane. According to the Eastern European sailors who visited the shipyard, the quay is 8 kilometers long, and was finished in the autumn of 2008.
A number of large containers have been shipped to the area near the dock. Among senior shipbuilding experts from Germany, France and Italy who examined the shipyard photos, one suggested the containers might be loaded with oxygen supplies and power-generating equipment, as huge amounts of oxygen and power would be required for welding engineering.
An Eastern European source familiar with the aircraft carrier project said China had invested 35 billion yuan (US$5.1 billion) in the facilities at Changxing Island, including three gigantic joint-structured indoor assembly workshops in which the separate sections of the carrier would be built.
The expert from the French shipbuilding industry said these facilities could be used for processing steel plates and section materials, or the preliminary treatment or assembly of separate sections of the carrier.
Sources say that the shipyard and all its facilities were built at a very fast pace. A separate road network was finished around January 2007, to provide safety and security for the project. Despite attempts at secrecy, many residents of the nearby Changxing township knew that the shipyard was being readied to make China’s first aircraft carrier.
The facilities include numerous five-story buildings – accommodations for nearly 60,000 peasant laborers hired to build the aircraft carrier facilities – that have been in use since early this year. A correspondent for Kanwa Defense Review visited the area to interview peasant workers recruited for this project. The workers said they were paid from 3,000 to 4,000 yuan (US$440 to $585) per month, which is three or four times what an ordinary laborer in Shanghai can earn, and that their living conditions were very good.
The round-shaped headquarters building was to be finished this spring. Free-standing residential buildings in red and grey have been constructed for the shipbuilding experts. Satellite photos show that these houses are quite luxurious.
Judging from the size of the three gigantic joint-structured indoor assembly workshops affiliated to Dock No.3, it is fully possible that the separate modules of the ship will be built in these workshops and finally assembled at the dock.
Sources claim that China intends to build, equip and launch its first aircraft carrier – internally named “Beijing” – between 2009 and 2015. It is possible that the process could take longer, however.
The first steps will include the processing and cutting of steel plates and section materials as well as the assembly of sectional parts. When the keel is laid down it will be difficult to keep it secret, as the keel of the aircraft carrier must be towed to the dock in one piece.
June 3 is a date worth watching, as that day will be the Jiangnan Shipyard’s 144th anniversary. It is part of Chinese culture to mark anniversaries in a special way to bring good fortune. Therefore, China may take the opportunity to officially launch the aircraft carrier project on this date.
Novo SSBN chinês é mais ruidoso que seus similares russos da década de 70
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F11%2Ftype-094-Jin.jpg&hash=30a3965391c2117151db59f05892f1dc)
A nova classe “Jin” (Type 094) de submarinos nucleares de mísseis balísticos (SSBN) é mais ruidosa que os submarinos russos das classes Delta III e Victor III da década de 1970, ou seja, um nível de ruído de submarinos de 30 anos atrás. A informação é do Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), Serviço de Inteligência da Marinha dos EUA.
O gráfico abaixo mostra onde se encaixaria a classe “Jin” no espectro de nível de ruído das principais classes de submarinos chineses e russos. A parte verde da seta indica os mais fáceis de detectar e a vermelha indica os mais silenciosos e difíceis de ouvir.
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F11%2Fchinasubsound.jpg&hash=6d577c5e393c65d78bb1a270145494fc)
É interessante observar como a Inteligência Naval americana obteve esses dados sobre a classe “Jin”. Provavelmente com o emprego dos navios SURTASS (um deles, envolvido num incidente próximo às águas territoriais chinesas) ou submarinos nucleares de ataque que seguiram de perto o primeiro Type 094 em suas provas de mar.
O elevado nível de ruído da classe “Jin” de SSBN coloca em xeque a capacidade nuclear de retaliação da China, pois esses submarinos poderão ser detectados e afundados antes que possam lançar seus mísseis balísticos.
Por outro lado a China tem avançado bastante na discrição dos seus submarinos nucleares de ataque (ver no gráfico a nova classe Type 095 próxima da “Akula” russa) e especialmente, nos seus submarinos convencionais (SSK). Ver gráfico abaixo:
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F11%2FSSK-noise-levels.jpg&hash=7bfe68abfcb7a9371a7cbc1ceaf82e10)
Mystery Chinese SSK fuels Asia's submarine race
The China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation has launched an unidentified new-type conventional submarine (SSK) at its Wuhan shipyard, according to Chinese reports.
It is the third new SSK design revealed by China since 1994 and is likely to exacerbate regional anxieties that are propelling many Asian states to increase or establish submarine fleets.
Vague or altered internet images of this new SSK, which first appeared on the popular Chinese CALF web page on 10 September, led observers to think that it may be yet another Chinese internet hoax, but the submarine's existence was confirmed by much clearer images on 13 September.
While not much larger than the 3,000- to 4,000-ton Type 041 Yuan class, the new boat appears to incorporate Russian design influences, including a stouter hull with a reduced aft taper similar to the Project 667 Lada/Amur class, plus an elongated sail and hull-mounted retractable hydroplanes similar to the Project 636 Kilo class. However, in contrast to the sail of the Kilo, the new Chinese SSK incorporates hydrodynamic elements such as an intricately-faired leading edge with concave and convex curves
http://www.janes.com/news/defence/jni/j ... _1_n.shtml (http://www.janes.com/news/defence/jni/jni100920_1_n.shtml)
http://www.informationdissemination.net ... inese.html (http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010/09/some-recent-developments-in-chinese.html)
Olá,
A marinha chinesa desequilibra o poder no sudeste asiatico.
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg17.imageshack.us%2Fimg17%2F9351%2Fchinaa.jpg&hash=caaa0706273bcadee0e712864853ee6d)
Nãao quero parecer estupido, mas aquilo são janelas?São sim senhor.
São sim senhor.
Citação de: "luis filipe silva"São sim senhor.
Já agora, porque razão é que o Tridente não tem nenhuma? ou são apenas usadas em SSBN's?
É um pormenor herdado dos submarinos soviéticos dos anos 60 e 70 (Golf, Tango, Foxtrot, Yankee e delta), dos quais deriva o desenho da vela.
E qual a vantagem desse pormenor?Provávelmente serve para resguardar o pessoal da vela ao navegar à superfície com mar alteroso ou gelo.
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY
Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007
* Comments (6)
* Add to My Stories
When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.
At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.
That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.
Uninvited guest: A Chinese Song Class submarine, like the one that sufaced by the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk
American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.
By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.
According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy.
The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat.
One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.
The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon.
The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines.
And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it.
According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.
It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence.
Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard".
The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels.
Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors.
Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War.
He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans.
"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan."
In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time.
First Chinese aircraft carrier nears completion
CHINA'S first aircraft carrier, built on the hull of an abandoned Soviet warship, is nearing completion, according to Western analysts.
The arrival of China as a member of the carrier club would be the most potent symbol of the country's burgeoning military power, even if its first model is based on a rehashed version of a warship that was never finished by its original owners. The Soviet Union collapsed before work could be completed.
The Varyag is expected to make its maiden voyage next year or 2012. "Photos regularly reveal an increasing tempo of work on the Varyag," Richard Fisher, an authority on the Chinese military at the International Assessment and Strategy Centre in Alexandria, Virginia, said yesterday.
"The island (control tower) is being much modified and a new Chinese radar system has been installed. We know little about its engine but it appears work has been proceeding on that as well."
The 300m warship was bought from Ukraine, which had acquired ownership when the Soviet Union was dismantled, and in 1998 it put the ship up for auction. China bought it for $US20 million and it was expected that the vessel would be turned into a casino.
For decades, China had disavowed any ambition to build aircraft carriers, but in more recent years, as the nation's economy has been transformed and Beijing has adopted a more muscular approach on the world stage, military officials have acknowledged the possession of a carrier fleet is crucial for the country's status.
It is likely the Varyag will be used as a training platform. It is believed China is planning to have multiple carriers by 2020.
Beijing is also ramping up production of unmanned aerial vehicles in an apparent bid to catch up with the leaders US and Israel in developing technology that is considered the future of military aviation.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/first-chinese-aircraft-carrier-nears-completion/story-e6frg6so-1225956776506
O que é que torna as catapultas tão difíceis de construir ao ponto de só os americanos as desenvolverem e mesmo as utilizadas pelos franceses sejam de design americano (penso eu)?
caro Papatango
Na mayonaise, na mostarda ou no ketchup, os desenhos referem-se a navios chineses, e não ao futuro porta-aviões americano. Claro que a nave Galáctica também ainda não foi construída, e eu vi-a na TV.
Isto é exequível?
http://www.strategypage.com/military_ph ... 15748.aspx (http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/20110721215748.aspx)
Isto é exequível?
http://www.strategypage.com/military_ph ... 15748.aspx (http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/20110721215748.aspx)
Citação de: "miguelbud"Isto é exequível?
http://www.strategypage.com/military_ph ... 15748.aspx (http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/20110721215748.aspx)
Sabes qual é o problema, é que qualquer um faz isto no PC e depois diz que é o futuro projecto chinês. Então eles passavam de recalchutar um PA soviético para isto? DÚVIDO!
Provavelmente o próximo PA chinês será uma melhoria do PA que eles acabaram de recalchutar.
Sabes qual é o problema, é que qualquer um faz isto no PC e depois diz que é o futuro projecto chinês. Então eles passavam de recalchutar um PA soviético para isto? DÚVIDO!Concordo, no entanto como os chineses sao dados a megalomanias e eu até ja vi o desenho de um PA chines que era submersível, este nao me chocou muito.
Provavelmente o próximo PA chinês será uma melhoria do PA que eles acabaram de recalchutar.
E até que ponto é que aquele tipo de porta-aviões seria eficiente?Esta seria a minha grande dúvida, pois num mar encapelado aquilo deve ser como andar de montanha russa e nao estou a ver avioes levantar voo nessas condiçoes, e muito menos aterrar.
Não me parece lá muito...
Future 054C class frigate CGI
Mais detalhes sobre o LHD Chinês Type 81
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.planobrasil.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F03%2FLHD-China-defense-1024x682.jpg&hash=68cf6253d55578d9b0abc43c6ba0df6d)
Informação e sugestão: Red Dragon para o Plano Brasil
Texto e adaptação: E.M.Pinto
Durante a recente Expo Defense security em Bangkok 2012 a China Shipbuilding Corporation (CSC) mostrou um modelo em escala do que seria o seu futuro porta Helicópteros, LHD 81.
Os rumores do surgimento do LHD Type 81 vem fluindo ao longo dos anos e a CSC trabalha atualmente na construção de grandes navios Ro-Ro. Com um deslocamento de 20.000 toneladas, este LHD pode acomodar mais de mil fuzileiros navais, além de fornecer suprimentos para os Type 71 em operações anfíbias.
O Interesse chinês num navio com estas características demonstram claramente as intenções chinesas de projeção de poder. Não há informações sobre quando e quantos navios a Marinha do Exército Popular da China pretende adquirir.
fonte: http://www.planobrasil.com/ (http://www.planobrasil.com/)
Primeira corveta ‘stealth’ chinesa Type 056 é lançada ao mar
A China lançou ao mar sua primeira corveta (fragata leve) Type 056. O navio deve deslocar cerca de 1.700t carregada e cumprirá missões de patrulha nas áreas marítimas de interesse da China.
Segundo fontes, deverão ser construídas 50 unidades da classe até 2017.
Características da corveta Type 056:
Comprimento: 89 metros
Deslocamento leve: 1.300 t
Velocidade máxima: 25 nós
Tripulação: 60
Alcance: 2.000 milhas a 18 nós
Armamento:
2 x 2 mísseis antinavio YJ802
1×8 SAM
1x canhão de 76mm
2 x canhões de 30mm
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2FType-056-corvette-580x870.jpg&hash=a5dddab91dbfadba8475c5913bda2907)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2FCorvette-056-2-580x384.jpg&hash=5e5f7b63fa33763900771993e839f682)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2FCorvette-056-580x379.jpg&hash=5065dcae67d87bc7c1bc49ec96c4a890)
http://www.naval.com.br/blog/#axzz1voZKo0jF (http://www.naval.com.br/blog/#axzz1voZKo0jF)
A China está a desenvolver uma nova classe de Contra-torpedeiros lança-mísseis. Estes navios estarão equipados com dois lançadores verticais de 32 unidades de mísseis anti-aéreos HQ-9B, além de outros mísseis anti-navio e anti-submarino, como o DF-41 com um alcance máximo de 14 mil Kms.
O novo tipo de navio pretende ser equivalente em capacidade e caraterísticas aos conhecidos cruzadores “Aegis” da US Navy e terá mais de 160 metros de comprimento recebendo a designação “Tipo 052C”. Os contra-torpedeiros Tipo 052C terão um radar Tipo 346 Active Phased Array e um radar Tipo 518 de longo alcance.
Um navio deste tipo, construido em grandes números representara uma importante adição à capacidade chinesa de projeção de poder a grandes distancias e juntamente com a frota de porta-aviões que Pequim está também a planear para as próximas décadas tornarão a China numa potencia naval capaz de rivalizar com qualquer das grandes potencias navais da atualidade.
Fonte:
http://www.defencetalk.com/china-developing-new-class-of-guided-missile-destroyer-44394/
China está construindo porta-aviões nuclear
Segundo site chinês, o navio-aeródromo deslocaria 80.000 toneladas e seria capaz de operar 60 aeronaves
Estes Chineses andam com uma velocidade impressionante... :mrgreen:
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fas.org%2Fprograms%2Fssp%2Fnukes%2F_images%2Fxia07.jpg&hash=a18a0680dc3a2d24b44f0fc16f066c37)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wantchinatimes.com%2Fnewsphoto%2F2013-11-02%2F450%2FCA27N0023H_2013%25E8%25B3%2587%25E6%2596%2599%25E7%2585%25A7%25E7%2589%2587_N71_copy1.JPG&hash=44dafb13641c2454d7116940589a3f05)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freewebs.com%2Fjeffhead%2Fmodelbuilds%2Fssn405.jpg&hash=996e262e64d95d18baff9fc97e7d473b)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpoGP1.jpg&hash=3bd3f6aea3fceaa79f3851602524c123)
Agora é verdade que os Chineses estão a construir qualquer coisa grande. Resta saber se será de facto nuclear ou convencional
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fresources3.news.com.au%2Fimages%2F2013%2F08%2F07%2F1226692%2F541891-bce920c8-fee7-11e2-a0b8-f32e1613e1fc.jpg&hash=228a9bc73edf007f362c020cefb54aea)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fresources2.news.com.au%2Fimages%2F2013%2F08%2F07%2F1226692%2F541698-ff3403ae-fee6-11e2-a0b8-f32e1613e1fc.jpg&hash=71f3d3b74a0a515d61e7487564d5be46)
Cumprimentos
Fuzileiros Navais Chineses
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FE1wTPrc.jpg&hash=0d6b50e884f8de6aa310a6d4187b40b3)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FiCFBXPW.jpg&hash=72af2b5a811bedf8756e29c98ff381a8)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FXLiZBdu.jpg&hash=e8cd144abeb8b03ba421763cec7a6dff)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FtEt8XZH.jpg&hash=67ace0a526f39c00f840e581b8b91eab)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FwoStrOd.jpg&hash=2b09cdf0c7d1bae5cffc1809af8f5b45)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FecCNREn.jpg&hash=ccfd9c958b3ca8e03a2ce2882f6c295d)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6YqMbpG.jpg&hash=29341e7e31130e5fff03db24d1c690f3)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqIPwTOQ.jpg&hash=794b7285f052bc4759846847645b916f)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FOdIIKDe.jpg&hash=3cb31cc0bea8b7fa66e9b7f5bef04c4e)
China has put the Shenyang J-15 Flying Shark carrier-borne multirole fighter into serial production, with at least eight production examples known to be flying already. This is in addition to the six J-15 prototypes, some of which conducted carrier trials on board China’s refurbished former Soviet Kuznetsov-class carrier, Liaoning.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.wp.com%2Fnews.usni.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F11%2FPLAN_J15_108.jpg%3Fresize%3D625%252C377&hash=67c13f3c315a298755e0c94ac6b49122)
A China continua num ritmo de construção naval alucinante: a Marinha do Exército de Libertação Popular da China (PLA Navy) construiu desde 2012, 24 corvetas Type 056 e incorporou 18 navios. O projeto do navio também atrai a atenção de outras Marinhas e foi exportado para Bangladesh.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F01%2FType-056-3D-2.jpg&hash=95f49deffe7bdf501951654205cf6492)
Os navios deslocam 1.500 toneladas carregados, têm um comprimento de 90m e boca de 11m. Podem atingir uma velocidade máxima de 25 nós e um alcance de 6.482 km (3.500 milhas náuticas) a 16 nós.
São equipados com um lançador de mísseis antiaéreos de oito células FL-3000N de curto alcance, quatro lançadores de mísseis superfície-superfície C-802, um canhão de 76 mm AK-176 como arma principal, e dois canhões de 30mm.
A newbuilt ship of an entirely new type for the PLA Ground Forces is currently running sea trials in the Sea of Bohai. It was launched at the Army’s Songliao Shipard at Dalian in August 2013.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdefence-blog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2FLSM-cmp-25.11.13.jpg&hash=d22af56ac8268d858808b5c84df0e72e)
Officially described as an Army Ro/Ro Transport, it is really a Landing Ship Medium (LSM), equipped with the with the typical kedging anchor of landing ships, even though the bulbous bow would preclude the ship from beaching.
The ship is equipped with both bow and stern ramps and a short helicopter platform aft. The armament consists of four twin 14.5 mm guns, two forward and two aft. Twin funnels indicate twin-screw propulsion; in addition, it has a bow thruster for improved maneuvrability.The lifting capacity is probably a mechanised infantry company.
The appearance online in late May of photographs of a semi-submersible ship, painted in a naval grey colour scheme, nearing completion at the Wenchong shipyard in Guangzhou has prompted speculation that China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is about to acquire a mobile landing platform (MLP).(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F984%2F51984%2Fp1639373.jpg&hash=29464a8e918a93de064bf8da2f367539)
The ship is around 180 m in length, with a beam of around 33 m and an estimated displacement of 5,000 tonnes. As such, it is much smaller than the US Military Sealift Command's Montford Point class of MLPs, which are 240 m long with a beam of 50 m.
China has apparently built a previously unseen midget submarine at its Wuchang shipyard in Wuhan.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F572%2F52572%2F1639979_-_main.jpg&hash=fbf926807f3a2dc15b370c2fe51d9022)
DigitalGlobe satellite imagery dated 24 October 2014 showing the submarine was posted on Google Earth and was highlighted by a contributor to the Bellingcat open source intelligence website.
The imagery shows the craft berthed at the pontoon used for fitting out submarines. The midget submarine had left the pontoon by late November and by mid-January 2015, another submarine, probably a Type 041 Yuan-class boat, occupied the berth.
Based on the imagery the midget submarine has an approximate length of 35 m and beam of 4 m, suggesting a surface displacement in the region of 400-500 tonnes.
The Wuchang shipyard is at the forefront of conventional submarine production in China and has constructed most of the Type 039 Song-class and Type 041 Yuan-class boats, including the most recent variant, with its distinctive hydrodynamic fairings between the casing and the fin. It also built the world's largest conventional submarine, the Type 032 Qing-class ballistic missile trials submarine.
First Photos of Chinese Navy fighter J-11BSH.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdefence-blog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F07%2FFirst-Photos-of-Chinese-Navy-fighter-F-11B-4.jpg&hash=5f2abb1bbac4f11d97fe6cc62fc6a4d5)
People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) watchers report that the second of the Type 052D 'Luyang III' class destroyers, Yangsha (pennant number 173), was commissioned in mid-July and joined China's South Sea Fleet.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F139%2F53139%2F1639501_-_main.jpg&hash=1063820fede8ed0c3ac0697a9d645337)
Yangsha is likely to operate from the PLAN base at Yalong Bay on Hainan Island. Although launched only four months after first-of-class Kunming (172), it was commissioned 16 months later, suggesting an extensive programme of trials.
The major change in the weapon systems between the Type 052D and the preceding Type 052C is the installation of a universal vertical launch weapon system capable of firing anti-air, anti-surface, anti-submarine, and land attack missiles. The Type 346 phased array radar has also been modified, so an intensive series of trials would be unsurprising.
Earlier in July, the seventh Type 052D emerged from the building shed at the Jiangnan Changxingdao shipyard in Shanghai and after launch joined the sixth of class currently fitting out. Photographs showing visible progress on the eighth and ninth hulls have also appeared.
One humble platform has proven instrumental to China's ongoing construction of seven island bases in the South China Sea: the civilian inland roll-on/roll-off (ro-ro) barge.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F636%2F53636%2Fp1642718.jpg&hash=b451fce0389e2207c8290a774e8d7bcf)
Satellite images of the larger newly built islands at Fiery Cross, Subi, and Mischief reefs show scores of ro-ro self-propelled barges offloading materials onto the new islands or transporting materials from larger bulk carriers anchored offshore.
A 15 June satellite image of Subi Reef showed that 17 out of 57 Chinese ships engaged in island construction were ro-ro self-propelled barges, while imagery of other sites has shown ro-ro barges to be an almost constant presence in the construction process. The barges have proven particularly useful in the South China Sea because their ramps obviate the need for dock construction.
The massive operation to build its new islands has also provided the People's Liberation Army (PLA) with perhaps its biggest opportunity for peacetime mobilisation of China's civilian inland shipping.
This has also given a large crew cadre valuable experience that could be applied to future military operations, perhaps in the Taiwan Strait or elsewhere in the South China Sea.
China has a long history of enlisting civilian shipping for military purposes. In recent years the PLA has invested heavily in supporting the construction of new large ro-ro ferries and ro-ro pure car and truck carriers (PCTC) to ensure they can carry militarily useful cargoes.
On 18 June China Daily reported that the PLA Nanjing Military Command (opposite Taiwan) and the Shanghai Specifications Institute had spent five years devising new specifications "that require all civilian shipbuilders to ensure that their new vessels are suitable for military use in an emergency".
This is reflected in military mobility exercises. For example, in July PLA media reported a Nanjing Military Region Army mobility exercise featuring a ro-ro inland barge transporting about 10 ZBD86D infantry fighting vehicles and ZSD89 armoured personnel carriers.
The vehicles were offloaded at sea from a larger civilian transport dock, indicating the PLA may plan to assemble groups of larger civilian vessels that carry military vehicles at a waypoint, for carriage to shore by self-propelled barges.
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.indianexpress.com%2F2015%2F09%2Fnavy.jpg&hash=c327e422bd7009b95d603bb0f5ca031f)
Chinese warships are spotted in the Bering Sea as Obama visits Alaska
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... laska.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3220223/Five-Chinese-ships-Bering-Sea-Obama-visits-Alaska.html)
Five Chinese Navy ships are sailing in international waters in the Bering Sea off Alaska, the Pentagon said on Wednesday, in an apparent first for China's military that came as President Obama toured the State. (...) The appearance of the ships is an example of the expanded reach of China's Navy (...)
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.defencetalk.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F09%2Fchinese-naval-warship-115-696x417.jpg&hash=f229251b3b66be67976f84c55156b74b)
Chinese Navy ships entered U.S. waters off Alaskan coast
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/04/polit ... us-waters/ (http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/04/politics/china-ships-alaska-us-waters/)
Chinese Navy ships entered U.S. territorial waters off of Alaska last week, coming within 12 miles of the coastline, multiple defense officials tod CNN Friday.
The Chinese ships were doing "operations consistent with international law", U.S. officials told CNN, under the maritime rule of "innocent passage", where ships are permitted to enter territorial waters and are not challenged so long as they keep moving directly and expeditiously. U.S. officials emphasized that Russian warships exercise "innocent passage" around Alaska with regularity. But this is a first for Chinese naval ships - and the transit took place when President Barack Obama was in Alaska. (...)
(...) The completion of the runway which previous imagery suggests only ocurred on recent weeks, will enable China to accelerate construction of infrastructure and potentially start air patrols over Spratly Islands, which are claimed and occupied by a number of countries. (...)
Fiery Cross Reef is the most extensive new mass land built by China in the Spratly Islands and is believed to be the future hub for operations in the Southern reaches of South China Sea. (...)
Satellite imagery of other Chinese construction sites in the Spratlys suggest that the smaller islands at Hughes, McKennan, Johnson South, Cuateron and Gaven reefs have been completed and communication and military hardware installed, but that dredging continues at Subi and Mischief reefs.
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.wp.com%2Fnews.usni.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F01%2F146943.jpg%3Fresize%3D615%252C449&hash=631b4c5a5b5739d2317c868fdaa0b998)
EUA e China realizarão mais exercícios militares conjuntos
http://www.defesaaereanaval.com.br/eua- ... conjuntos/ (http://www.defesaaereanaval.com.br/eua-e-china-realizarao-mais-exercicios-militares-conjuntos/)
Os Estados Unidos e a China concordaram melhorar seu diálogo militar e realizar mais exercícios navais conjuntos, afirmou nesta sexta-feira o presidente chinês, Xi Jinping, em uma entrevista coletiva ao lado do presidente americano, Barack Obama. "Afirmamos inteiramente o progresso feito nos mecanismos de confiança entre as duas forças militares", disse Xi. "Concordamos em aumentar o intercâmbio e os diálogos sobre políticas entre nossos militares em todos os niveis e incrementar o treinamento e os exercícios militares conjuntos" (...)
O compromisso para expandir a cooperação militar segue dois Memorandos de Entendimento sobre Medidas para Elevar a Confiança (CBMs, na sigla em inglês) que EUA e a China assinaram em novembro de 2014.
Como parte dos CBMs, Washington e Pequim prometeram evitar confrontos militares na Ásia. Os CBMs estipulam que os dois países notifiquem um ao outro de grandes atividades militares, desenvolvimento de políticas e estratégias e regras de combate em incidentes aéreos e marítimos.
(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.extremetech.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F08%2Fchinese-submarines-lined-up-640x480.jpg&hash=eb06c56c06a1c2813cb6bae2bd97e4f8)
A Marinha do Exército de Libertação Popular da China (PLA Navy) incorporou sua 25ª corveta Type 056, em 20 de fevereiro. A Tongren (indicativo 507) entrou em serviço na Frota do Mar do Sul, e irá juntar-se ao 24° Esquadrão de Fragatas Leves baseado em Shantou, província de Guangdong, a cerca de 275 km ao nordeste de Hong Kong.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.wp.com%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2FType-056.jpg%3Fw%3D2974&hash=a07efcff6a35f7c2a5169f9157b994d8)
Embora a produção desta classe de navios tenha começado em 2012, a Type 056 já é uma das mais numerosas da PLA Navy, com mais unidades a caminho. O casco número 31 foi lançado em 25 de dezembro de 2015 e há indícios de mais navios em construção. No sua avaliação das capacidades da PLA Navy, o US Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) prevê que entre 30 e 60 desses navios serão construídos.
A Marinha do Exército de Libertação Popular da China (PLA Navy) incorporou em janeiro de 2016 o sexto navio de apoio logístico da classe “Qiandaohu”, o Gaoyaohu (indicativo 966).(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2FGaoyaohu-Type-903A-2.jpg%3Fw%3D1600&hash=d6c55a83de621c24aad2d21222932024)
O navio é da versão Type 903A, com deslocamento de 23.000 toneladas. Os dois primeiros da classe Type 903 deslocam 20.000 toneladas.
Mais dois navios da classe estão em construção e vão permitir à Marinha Chinesa aumentar a autonomia das operações em mares distantes.
O Type 055 é uma classe de destróier de mísseis guiados que está em desenvolvimento para a Força de Superfície da Marinha do Exército de Libertação Popular da China. Ele será uma evolução da classe Type 052.Interessante.
Em abril de 2014, imagens divulgadas na Internet mostraram um “mock-up” em escala total da superestrutura de um grande navio de guerra que foi erguido na área de testes de eletrônica naval em Wuhan, na China. O “mock-up” apresenta um mastro integrado fechado para radar e outros equipamentos eletrônicos. Observadores concluíram que a instalação em terra era para uma nova classe de navio de guerra chinês, deslocando de 10 a 12.000 toneladas em plena carga, popularmente conhecido como Type 055.
Os chineses divulgaram novas fotos de operações aéreas com jatos J-15 (cópia chinesa do Su-33) a bordo do seu porta-aviões “Liaoning”.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F09%2FLiaoning-new-1.jpg%3Fresize%3D640%252C409&hash=46b7c858612c2d1be62152e64999d76e)
Aos poucos a China vai desenvolvendo sua doutrina de operação que vai estar presente nos futuros porta-aviões atualmente em construção.
Para quem há poucos anos não sabia nada de aviação naval de asa-fixa, até que está se saindo muito bem.
China's latest intelligence-gathering ship was commissioned into the North Sea Fleet of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) at a ceremony in Qingdao on 10 January, according to Chinese news media reports.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F853%2F66853%2F1692747_-_main.jpg&hash=aac35381b5b035f591c63d83a13ad39c)
Named Kaiyangxing (pennant number 856), the vessel was built at the Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard in Shanghai and is the fourth of the Dongdiao class (Type 815) to be commissioned in the past two years.
The first of the six 6,000-tonne ships currently in service with the PLAN was commissioned in 1999. Subsequent vessels have had changes made to their superstructure and masts, and are generally referred to as Type 815A.
The ships have a highly distinctive profile with very large spherical radomes, which are likely to be covering sensitive dish antennas for intercepting and collecting very low-power radio signals.
There are differences between the ships in the configuration of the antennas and Kaiyangxing has a unique flat-topped cylindrical radome above the bridge.
The six vessels in service are allocated evenly between the PLAN's North, East, and South Sea fleets.
China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) commissioned its fifth Luyang III-class (Type 052D) destroyer on 22 January.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F151%2F67151%2F1695097_-_main.jpg&hash=db943f0bfc21752a0d108cefbd3a72b5)
Named Xining (with pennant number 117), the vessel is the first Type 052D to be assigned to the PLAN's North Sea Fleet, with the other four ships allocated to the South Sea Fleet. The commissioning ceremony took place at the Guzhenkou naval base south of Qingdao and was conducted by Rear Admiral Zhang Wendan, the newly appointed commander of the North Sea Fleet.
The 7,500-tonne Type 052Ds have two vertical-launch system (VLS) grids each containing 32 cells: one forward of the bridge and the other forward of the hangar. The VLS supports the HHQ-9A long-range surface-to-air missile, giving the ship an area air-defence capability. The VLS is also thought to be capable of firing land-attack and anti-ship cruise missiles.
The Type 052Ds are also equipped with the Type 346A multifunction phased array radar (commonly known as Dragon Eye).
Evidence recently emerged that the Type 052D destroyers are also fitted with variable depth and towed array sonars, which give them considerably greater anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities than the PLAN's previous classes of destroyer. The VLS may also be equipped with a stand-off ASW torpedo-carrying missile.
The vessels' twin hangars are capable of embarking either Harbin Z-9 or Kamov Ka-28 anti-submarine helicopters or Kamov Ka-31 airborne early warning helicopters.
China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has commissioned a new training ship for the Dalian Naval Academy. Named Qi Jiguang (pennant number 83), the vessel entered service on 21 February at the Lushun Naval Base, near Dalian, which is expected to be its base port.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.janes.com%2Fimages%2Fassets%2F194%2F68194%2F1692887_-_main.jpg&hash=4d0367c0c0d3101ac72d536a800c74d9)
The ceremony was attended by Vice Admiral Tian Zhong, deputy commander of the PLAN and former commander of the North Sea Fleet. Rear Admiral Yan Zhengming, the commandant of the Dalian Naval Academy, also attended.
The ship is reported to be 163 m long, with a beam of 22 m and a displacement of 9,000 tonnes. Diesel engines provide propulsion and it has a maximum speed of 22 kt.
The vessel is purpose built for initial sea training of naval cadets and footage broadcast on China Central Television (CCTV) shows an impressive level of equipment.
In addition to large classrooms for trainees to undertake conventional navigation chart work, the ship has a large lecture theatre and facilities for computer based training, including a bridge/ship handling simulator. It is also equipped with a gymnasium.
The ship is designed to be capable of embarking 400 junior officers for training, with up to 50 training staff.
The ship is lightly armed with a 76 mm single barrelled H/PJ-26 mounting on the fo'c's'le and two 30 mm H/PJ-17 guns installed forward of the bridge.
The ship has a large flight deck but no hangar.
DALIAN, 26 de abril (ChinaMil) – A cerimônia de lançamento do segundo porta-aviões da China foi realizada no Estaleiro Dalian da China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation (CSIC) na manhã de 26 de abril de 2017. O General Fan Changlong, do Comitê Central do Partido Comunista da China (PCC) e vice-presidente da Comissão Militar Central da China (CMC), participaram da cerimônia e proferiram um discurso.(https://www.forumdefesa.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.naval.com.br%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F04%2FCV001A-6-640x352.jpg&hash=93dd0530cd242c13ae0c04d48c88c67d)
A cerimônia foi iniciada com o magnífico hino nacional às 9h e uma garrafa de champanhe foi quebrada no porta-aviões como uma forma costumeira de abençoar o navio. Depois disso, o navio foi lentamente rebocado para fora do estaleiro e transferido para o cais.
O segundo porta-aviões chinês foi construído totalmente pela China. O país começou a construí-lo em novembro de 2013. No momento, o casco principal foi concluído e os principais dispositivos do sistema, incluindo fontes de energia foram instalados nos seus lugares.
Desdocar e lançar é um dos pontos mais importantes da construção de porta-aviões, e marcam progressos significativos em fase de concepção e construção de forma independente. Em seguida, o navio irá receber seus dispositivos de sistema e terminar a construção como planejado, e iniciar os testes de uma maneira geral.
O Comandante da Marinha, Shen Jinlong, o Comissário Político da Marinha, Miao Hua, e o Presidente do CSIC, Hu Wenming, também participaram da cerimônia.
Se a classe Kuznetsov tivesse sido construída no século XXI.
China's Most advanced destroyer Type 52D stuck in Indian ocean for last 2 weeks due to engine failure(https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/19895089_1398854100208563_2404471743564923514_n.jpg?oh=699a0e7003c3352aecce52436b5a25cd&oe=59CAF960)
Credits : IADN
https://www.facebook.com/DeadliestTeach/?hc_ref=OTHER&pnref=story (https://www.facebook.com/DeadliestTeach/?hc_ref=OTHER&pnref=story)
Chinese Warships In Heart of Europe Rattle Western Powers Out of Their Security Dream
(Source: People's Daily Online; published July 26, 2017)
By Curtis Stone
Russian and Chinese warships kicked off the active naval stage of the Maritime Cooperation 2017 drills on July 25 in the Baltic Sea—the heart of Europe, shaking the West’s sense of security.
Three Chinese Navy ships—the Hefei guided missile destroyer, the Yuncheng frigate, and the Luomahu supply ship—appeared in the Baltic Sea for the kick off the routine joint drills, becoming the first Chinese naval group to pay a visit to the Baltic Sea. The series of drills are expected to last until July 28, and will include anti-ship, anti-submarine, and anti-aircraft defense maneuvers. China and Russia have been holding the joint naval drills since 2012.
Piers Cazalet, the acting spokesman for NATO, said that the naval drills in the Baltic Sea “are an example of China’s growing military capabilities and its increasingly significant global role,” The New York Times reported.
The joint naval drills in the Baltic Sea are rattling the nerves of the Western powers. However, the Chinese government has made it clear that the drills are not aimed at any third party, which, by definition, includes NATO. In addition, China does not have a ruthless history of colonialism.
But it is hard for the Western powers to shake off that old thinking of world domination. “The Baltic Sea is the heart of Europe. One can only imagine how uncomfortable the China-Russia military exercise is making them,” said Xiakedao, the WeChat account of the overseas edition of the People’s Daily.
The West’s anxiety over the joint naval drills is evident from their “little tricks,” as noted by Xiakedao. The former world power dispatched its Royal Navy to shadow the high-tech Chinese armada through the English Channel on its way to join Russia’s fleet. This is routine business for the United Kingdom, but the Netherlands and Denmark also dispatched warships.
NATO countries are worried about the growing strategic partnership between China and Russia and the joint naval exercises are being watched closely by NATO warships in the area. The U.S. European Command (EUCOM) said in a statement that the U.S. is “closely tracking Russian exercises with other participants, like China,” according to Stars and Stripes, a news organization that provides news and information to the U.S. military community.
The hysteria is ridiculous. In total, about 10 ships, including the three Chinese warships, are taking part in the joint military exercises. In addition, it took the Chinese warships 40 days to reach the distant frontier, according to Russian news agency Sputnik. Compare that to the scale and frequency of NATO military exercises at Russia’s doorstep or the scale and frequency of U.S military exercises at China’s doorstep, and it is obvious that the naval drills are trivial in comparison. “There is no need for NATO to be so fragile,” said Xiakedao.
Members of NATO ought to be extremely uneasy—but for very different reasons. U.S. President Donald Trump has called into question the “enduring purpose and nature” of the military and political organization and demanded members pay the U.S. for “protection,” which is problem for the European countries that are struggling with slow to no growth. Furthermore, the new administration is basically just sharpening the edge of former U.S. President Barack Obama’s failed “rebalance to Asia and the Pacific” policy by putting more emphasis on the military dimension. Clearly the U.S.’s “rock-solid” commitment to the alliance is in question.
The truth of the matter regarding the joint naval drills is much more mundane. While China and Russia are forging closer military ties, they are not forming a formal military alliance to engage in expansion or to defend against the potential threat of aggression. China has been very clear that it has no intention to seek expansion. And although China is rising as the West declines, the country is focused on development and cooperation—and not world domination. As for Russia, the most important task is to build up the economy. What this all means, of course, is that routine military cooperation between China and Russia is not the next NATO.
Depuis la mise en service du premier bâtiment de classe en Mars 2013, on se rapproche bientôt de la 5e année où les corvettes Type 056 ont commencé à s’intégrer au sein des forces navales de l’armée chinoise.
Si l’on croit au chiffre selon lequel une « soixantaine » d’exemplaires a été commandé par la marine chinoise, évoqué par une source « insider », ce programme de bâtiment de combat léger de classe 1 000 tonnes, conçu entre autres pour la protection des intérêts maritimes chinois dans ses zones économiques exclusives situées à 200 milles marins des côtes et les conflits d’intensité faible, a déjà parcouru ⅔ de son chemin, du moins jusqu’à hier.
En effet, un article paru sur le site de l’armée chinois 81.cn ce lundi 15 Janvier nous indique que la nouvelle corvette 540 Wuhai a rejoint la 19e flottille de frégates, une unité de la flotte du Nord basée sur l’île de Haiyang, qui se trouve au large de la ville de Dalian situé au nord de la Chine. C’est dans cette même ville que le 2e porte-avions est en cours d’agencement.
Il s’agit donc de la 39e corvette Type 056 mise en service dans la marine chinoise, qui est également de la variante Type 056A, le 18e de série, spécialisée dans la lutte anti-sous-marines.
Le bâtiment mesurant 88,9 mètres de long et 11,14 mètres au maître-bau a été mis à l’eau au chantier naval Liaonan le 12 Septembre 2016. Tout comme ses sisterships, 540 Wuhai déplace 1 340 tonnes pleine charge et son système de propulsion CODAD permet au navire de filer au delà de 25 nœuds, avec une autonomie économique de 2 000 miles nautiques.
Côté systèmes de combat, le navire est équipée d’une suite de combat et de communication dédiée à l’ASW, des missiles ASROC, des grenades anti-sous-marines, des torpilles légères et un sonar remorqué, ainsi qu’un canon principal H/PJ-26 de calibre 76mm, deux CIWS aux canons H/PJ-17 de calibre 30mm et un CIWS aux missiles HQ-10 à huit tubes.
Les 95 membres d’équipage sont dirigés désormais par le capitaine de frégate ZHAO Jiang Long (赵江龙), qui se voit confier le navire au prix de 710 millions de yuan (environ 90 millions d’€ au taux de change actuel) par le contre-amiral YAO Li Qiang (姚立强), commandant adjoint de la base navale Liaoning, dans une cérémonie officielle qui a eu lieu hier à 10h00 du matin heure locale.
Les représentants civils de Wuhai, une ville minière de 550 000 habitants située à l’ouest de la région autonome de Mongolie-Intérieure en Chine, ont également été présents. Le bâtiment 540 Wuhai est le premier de classe portant le nom d’une ville dans cette province chinoise.
China wants to become east Asia's dominant power. And in order to do that, the country needs a navy that can balance out American and US-allied assets in the region.
China wants a force that is capable of operating for extended periods in the open ocean, away from the coasts or support bases. A "blue-water navy" would allow China to protect vital trade routes while also enabling Beijing to project force in areas far from China's coastline.
Beijing's naval development could be one of the biggest strategic challenges the US faces in coming decades. And the Chinese navy is already pretty formidable. The following graphic from the US Office of Naval Intelligence shows every surface ship in the Chinese Navy as of February 2015 (you can view a much larger version of the graphic here):
In 1981 China launched the Xia-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), derived from the Han-class SSN. A ballistic missile submarine force would enhance Beijing's assurance of an effective retaliatory capability, as well as strengthening her deterrent posture. Despite a potential for operations in the Pacific Ocean, capabilities would be very limited against modern Western or Russian ASW capabilities. China’s first ballistic missile submarine, the Type 092 Xia-class, was never considered to be a survivable deterrent. The product of “trial and error" (many onboard systems have been upgraded and tested at sea) the Type 092 spent little time away from the pier.
Operations have been limited and the Xia has never sailed beyond Chinese regional waters. The sole existing Xia-class SSBN may never have made an operational deployment [in the sense that American SSBNs deployed], and had reportedly been in overhaul [some thought undergoing disposal] since 1995. To the surprise of some, the Xia was sighted during PLAN exercises in December 2000. This is the first time the Xia had been sighted at sea since upgrades in 1995.
A second hull was reportedly launched in 1982, but little evidence for the career of this boat subesquently emerged. It is certainly not currently in service, with unsubstantiated reports claiming it was lost in a 1985 accident.
It is generally agreed that the single unit of this class entered the shipyard in 1995. Some sources suggest the work was possibly to fit the new JL-2 SLBM system, with the upgrade expected to be completed in 1998, but this appears not to have been the case. The JL-2 (CSS-NX-4) SLBM is reported to carry 3 or 4 MIRV (90kT each) or a single 250kt warhead with a range of 8,000km. Other reports suggest that as of late 1999 China was completing re-construction the second Xia-class missile submarine, with a modified design that can launch the new longer-range JL-2s. However, authoritative sources doubt that the Type 92 is being modified to launch the JL-2.
As of March 2001 the US Defense Intelligence Agency reported that the single XIA class SSBN was "not operational." The boat, fitted with 12 JL-1 or JL-1A missiles, had been expected to return to service in mid-1999.
In March 2007 Seapower Magazine published an article based on information supplied by the US Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), and subsequently obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. According to ONI, China's XIA SSBN, which was launched in 1983 and had twice successfully fired a 1,770 km range JL-l SLEM, remained in active service with the Chinese Navy and likely constituted a limited component of China's nuclear deterrent force. As such, the XIA is more than a test~bed for the Chinese Navy. Although the range of the JL-l limits the XIA's utility as a deterrent platfonn, targets throughout the region, including US military facilities, could be targeted with the J-l from launch points inside traditional Chinese Navy operating areas.
China's sole XIA Class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) - SSBN #406 - was extended through at least 2010. The Type 94 replacement is equiped with the new JL-2 SLBM system. The Type 092 was noted in imagery to be undergoing refit or repair using the Jianggezhuang Submarine Base drydock [near Qingdao], occupying the drydock between 2005 and 2007. By 2013 the status of the XIA was unclear. The US DOD annual report Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China last mentioned this boat in 2010, and there is no hint of it in subsequent reports. Previous reports of its demise had proven greatly exagerated, though it was never really operational in the American sense. World Warships reported it in service, as of 19 September 2012. Asian Military Review reported the boat as "probably not operational". The latest edition of Combat Fleets of the World, published September 2013, reports that the boat was "expected to remain in service until 2012" which is not much help. World Defense Almanac 2013 reports the boat still in service, as does the authoritative Military Balance. Chinese Military Review published a new set of [undated] photographs of the Type 092 Xia in January 2013, showing the boat tied up pierside.
Type 002 aircraft carrier returned to Dalian port today, after 5 days of sea trial.
(https://scontent.flis5-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/32836846_1634298129940442_1187060365691715584_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=296374a321710ad49056ca07e56bf290&oe=5B7850DB)
A tank landing ship and what appears to be an electromagnetic railgun weapon were spotted along the Yangtze River, presumably heading for sea trials.
Chinese outlets said recently that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy is “making notable achievements on advanced weapons, including sea tests of electromagnetic railguns”.
Segundo porta-aviões chinês necessitará de apoio logístico robusto
O navio só poderá operar durante seis dias no mar sem reabastecimento, mas uma nova base está sendo construída no Fiery Cross Reef
Problemas de reabastecimento podem surgir como um grande obstáculo para as capacidades de combate do segundo porta-aviões da China, conhecido inicialmente como “Type 001A” (redesignado como Type 002), que está agora no seu estágio final de testes e ajustes antes de entrar em serviço, provavelmente até o final deste ano.
O porta-aviões de construção chinesa, que funciona com óleo combustível naval, é inspirado no seu antecessor, o Liaoning, de fabricação soviética, e possui os mesmos sistemas básicos de propulsão que seu navio irmão.
Assim como o Liaoning e outros navios da classe “Kuznetsov” da era soviética, o novo porta-aviões precisará armazenar cerca de 13.000 toneladas métricas de óleo combustível naval para suas operações, além das necessidades dos seis a oito destróieres de mísseis guiados e corvetas que formam um grupo de combate maior.
Uma missão para reabastecer os tanques do porta-aviões será necessária sempre que um terço do estoque total de combustível for consumido, como visto no acordo de logística do Exército de Libertação Popular para o desdobramento anti-pirataria no Golfo de Aden, onde acompanha navios mercantes chineses, segundo para o Kanwa Defense Review.
O segundo porta-aviões consumirá 1.100 toneladas de combustível por dia ao navegar a 20 nós (37 quilômetros por hora) e cerca de 400 toneladas a mais durante operações de combate. O esquadrão de caça J-15 a bordo do porta-aviões também precisará de suprimento adequado de combustível de aviação, bem como outros óleos lubrificantes.
Quando o novo porta-aviões estiver em alto-mar, o navio de abastecimento, munição e suprimento Type 903 de 23.000 toneladas será a principal fonte de combustível, alimentos e outros suprimentos. No entanto, essa restrição de capacidade significa que a Marinha terá dificuldade de reabastecer todo o grupo de ataque de porta-aviões mais que duas vezes seguidas.
É mais um Cruzador que um Destroyer. ::)
E vejam o número de VLS que o bicho tem. :o
The principal armament of the Type 055 class centres around its vertical launch system (VLS), which comprises 64 cells forward of the bridge and 48 cells forward of the hangar. The VLS adopts the same universal silos for the missiles as the Type 052D-class destroyers and can launch HHQ-9 surface-to air-missiles, YJ-18 anti-ship missiles, Yu-8 torpedo carrying anti-submarine missiles and CJ-10 land-attack cruise missiles.https://www.janes.com/article/93656/chinese-navy-s-first-type-055-class-destroyer-enters-service
As ações assertivas da China continuam apesar da disseminação do COVID-19
Dr. Satoru Nagao
(https://english.khabarhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/China-Assertive.jpg)
15 de abril de 2020
As ações assertivas da China continuam apesar da disseminação do COVID-19
Diante da pandemia do COVID-19, a principal prioridade para a maioria dos países tem sido interromper a propagação do vírus.
A China, por outro lado, continua suas assertivas operações militares em toda a região indo-pacífica, apesar de ser o primeiro país a sofrer com o vírus.
Todos os dias, de 4 de março a 4 de abril, a China enviava navios de guarda costeira ao redor da Ilha Senkaku do Japão. Em 16 de março, os navios da Guarda Costeira da China dispararam um tiro e atingiram um navio de guarda costeira de Taiwan perto de Little Kinmen.
Em 4 de abril, um navio da Guarda Costeira da China atingiu o barco de pesca vietnamita, afundando-o perto das Ilhas Paracel, no Mar da China Meridional.
A Guarda Costeira da China também deteve dois navios vietnamitas que tentavam resgatar oito tripulantes do navio afundado. A China continuou a fortalecer suas ilhas artificiais no Mar do Sul da China, abrindo duas novas instalações de pesquisa em março.
As instalações realizarão pesquisas que contribuem para a defesa dessas ilhas artificiais e o envio de tropas chinesas.
Para manter os adversários longe da infraestrutura costeira crítica, a China tem mobilizado forças armadas e construído ilhas artificiais.
Mesmo no Oceano Índico, a China implantou doze drones subaquáticos chamados “Sea Wing”. De dezembro de 2019 a fevereiro de 2020, esses drones coletaram informações científicas de apoio às atividades submarinas.
Além disso, em fevereiro, quatro navios de guerra da Marinha da China, incluindo um destróier 052D e um navio de reabastecimento, viajaram 300 km das costas do Havaí.
A localização do 052D era particularmente ameaçadora porque seu míssil de cruzeiro YJ-18, com alcance de 500 km, poderia chegar à sede do Comando do Pacífico dos EUA.
Essas atividades ilustram que, enquanto o resto do mundo concentra seus esforços no combate ao COVID-19, o comportamento agressivo da China em relação a seus vizinhos permanece inalterado.
Motivação da China
O surto de COVID-19 teve pouco efeito sobre os objetivos da China ou seus esforços para atender a duas principais preocupações de segurança: a primeira preocupação é a defesa das áreas costeiras da China: muitas cidades e áreas industriais ao longo da costa são essenciais para o desenvolvimento econômico da China.
Para combater a ameaça que os EUA e a Índia podem representar, a China decidiu estabelecer uma presença no Sul da Ásia. A China iniciou a construção de um porto no Sri Lanka e também está construindo portos em outros países que fazem fronteira com o Oceano Índico, como o Paquistão, Bangladesh e Mianmar.
Para manter os adversários longe da infraestrutura costeira crítica, a China tem mobilizado forças armadas e construído ilhas artificiais.
Além disso, a China não apenas visa impedir a invasão do inimigo perto de suas águas costeiras - no Mar da China Oriental, perto de Taiwan e no Mar da China Meridional -, mas está impulsionando sua atividade defensiva até o Havaí.
De grande preocupação, a China também pode estar procurando implantar uma arma nuclear no Mar da China Meridional, o que tornaria sua linha defensiva praticamente invencível.
Se a China implantasse submarinos com armas nucleares no Mar da China Meridional, os EUA precisariam tomar muito cuidado para evitar um conflito que poderia se transformar em uma guerra nuclear.
Com a situação tão inflamável, quem pode se arriscar no Mar da China Meridional? Portanto, um submarino com armas nucleares tem o potencial de tornar a fortaleza da China no Mar da China quase impenetrável.
Outra preocupação de segurança é o "dilema de Malaca." O desenvolvimento econômico da China depende das linhas de comunicação marítima (SLOC) que atravessam o estreito de Malaca, controlado pelos EUA.
Um bloqueio do Estreito pela Marinha dos EUA interromperia a atividade econômica da China. Para mitigar esse risco, a China criou novas rotas de energia e comércio: Oriente Médio-Paquistão-China, Oriente Médio-Mianmar-China e outros. Pequim ainda tem motivos de preocupação com a segurança no Oceano Índico.
Para combater a ameaça que os EUA e a Índia podem representar, a China decidiu estabelecer uma presença no Sul da Ásia. A China iniciou a construção de um porto no Sri Lanka e também está construindo portos em outros países que fazem fronteira com o Oceano Índico, como o Paquistão, Bangladesh e Mianmar.
Tanto os EUA quanto a Índia se referem a isso como a estratégia "colar de pérolas", enquanto a China diz que esses projetos fazem parte da Iniciativa do Cinturão e Rota (BRI).
A China destacou forças militares para proteger as rotas, incluindo o estabelecimento de uma base no Djibuti, a realização de pesquisas científicas para apoiar o destacamento de forças e o destacamento de forças navais e terrestres na região do Oceano Índico. presença constante de seis a oito navios de guerra no Oceano Índico.
A resposta dos EUA
A China assumirá o controle dessas áreas? A chave está na resposta dos EUA. Atualmente, os EUA estão aumentando os esforços para impedir as atividades da China.
Em janeiro e fevereiro, a Marinha dos EUA realizou operações de liberdade de navegação nas proximidades das ilhas artificiais da China no mar da China Meridional. Os EUA fizeram isso para demonstrar que a China não podia reivindicar os 20 quilômetros do mar que circunda as ilhas. como águas territoriais.
Em fevereiro, os EUA realizaram exercícios de mísseis de fogo vivo perto do Mar da China Meridional. No final de fevereiro, foi a primeira vez que os caças F-35 dos EUA participaram de exercícios internacionais na Tailândia. Em março, um porta-aviões dos EUA chamou um porto em Vietnam.
No final daquele mês, o presidente Donald Trump assinou a Lei TAIPEI, que visa fortalecer o relacionamento dos EUA com Taiwan.
No entanto, no futuro, o COVID-19 pode moldar significativamente a política chinesa dos EUA - direta e indiretamente - e os EUA estão frustrados porque a China não foi apenas a fonte do vírus, mas também ocultou informações que acabaram levando à sua rápida disseminação global.
A rápida disseminação que pegou tantos desprevenidos levou algumas autoridades americanas a chamar a pandemia de "Pearl Harbor" desta geração. A crise do COVID-19 sem dúvida afetará o resultado da eleição presidencial dos EUA em novembro e as atitudes em relação à China.
Quando os EUA superarem o pico do vírus e reajustarem sua estratégia na China (sob a administração atual ou uma nova), a abordagem escolhida pelos EUA afetará a situação de segurança em todo o Indo-Pacífico.
(O escritor é professor visitante no Instituto Hudson, EUA)
(Instituto do Nepal para cooperação e engajamento internacional (NIICE), think tank independente do Nepal e Khabarhub - o popular portal de notícias do Nepal - se uniram para divulgar artigos de pesquisa do NIICE no Nepal)
https://english.khabarhub.com/2020/15/88899/
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20200413/k10012385361000.html (https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20200413/k10012385361000.html)
https://blogos.com/article/450802/
China's first big-deck amphibious assault ship, a huge vessel that was built in a miraculously short amount of time, caught fire on Saturday, April 11th, 2020. Photos and video showing the ship billowing large clouds of black smoke hit Chinese social media earlier in the day. The warship, which is the first of the new Type 075 class, was resting alongside the pier at its birthplace, Hudong–Zhonghua Shipbuilding in Shanghai, when the blaze broke out.
You can and should read all about the Type 075 and why it is a major accomplishment for the rapidly expanding People's Liberation Army Navy in this past piece of ours.
E as 12.7 dos Tejo
Hoje disseram-me que na cimeira da NATO, os membros vão ser apertados a cumprir com os 2% do PIB, face as novas ameaças...
O triunvirato Costa-Leão-Cravinho até é capaz de se comprometer com 2,5%, mas, como de costume, é para a boca, porque nunca há a intenção de cumprir o quer que seja.
China commissions its largest ocean-going patrol ship
INDUSTRY NEWS
October 26, 2021, by Fatima Bahtić
China has commissioned its largest maritime patrol vessel in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province to enhance maritime security operations in the deep sea.
The vessel Hai Xu 09 measures 165 meters in length, with a width of 20.6 meters and 9.5 meters depth. It has a maximum speed of over 25 knots. According to the officials, the vessel has a full load displacement of 10,700 tons, making it the country’s first official vessel with a displacement of more than 10,000 tons.
The unit is equipped with a helicopter landing pad and a data center with satellite communication systems, including China’s Beidou Navigation Satellite System. Furthermore, it was designed to sail up to 90 days between being supplied with fuel and food.
Its construction started in May 2019 at the China State Shipbuilding yard in Guangzhou while the launching ceremony was held in September 2020.
Local media reported that “it will serve as a mobile law enforcement platform for maritime patrols as well as emergency coordination and command and command of pollution prevention.”
The patrol vessel will be operated under China Maritime Safety Administration’s Guangzhou unit.
https://www.navaltoday.com/2021/10/26/china-commissions-its-largest-ocean-going-patrol-ship/
https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/china-commissions-large-ocean-going-patrol-vessel
(https://www.maritime-executive.com/media/images/article/Photos/Navy_Govt_CoastGuard/Chinese-patrol-vessel.29dd04.jpg)
(https://www.maritime-executive.com/media/images/article/Photos/Navy_Govt_CoastGuard/Chinese-patrol-vessel-2.jpg)
Ò raio, manhosos dos chineses com as suas invenções! :mrgreen:
(https://i.postimg.cc/RF657XJQ/276069439-5369998776346011-1378371702617438349-n.jpg)
Por cá, reina o "holistiquíssimo"...
I had the rare chance to tour a PLAN Type 052DL... NANNING 162. No big camera allowed on board but filming short clips with 🤳was OK. The SWO escorting us was fluent in English and willing to share technical details (to a point...). Ship was in pristine condition
"I will share an exchange I had with a Chinese admiral...He made it very clear to me that our logistics ships were a primary target, because if he can take out logistics, he takes out the lifeblood of the fighting ships..."
--ADM Gary Roughhead, CNO 2007-2011
Citar"I will share an exchange I had with a Chinese admiral...He made it very clear to me that our logistics ships were a primary target, because if he can take out logistics, he takes out the lifeblood of the fighting ships..."
--ADM Gary Roughhead, CNO 2007-2011
https://twitter.com/AncientSubHunt/status/1629729669988642816
Citar"I will share an exchange I had with a Chinese admiral...He made it very clear to me that our logistics ships were a primary target, because if he can take out logistics, he takes out the lifeblood of the fighting ships..."
--ADM Gary Roughhead, CNO 2007-2011
https://twitter.com/AncientSubHunt/status/1629729669988642816
O chinês tem razão e a ideia é boa...
Interesting year over year development of the Chinese J-35 (FC-31). The Sub Brief YouTube channel will be documenting the integration and sea trials of the Fujian carrier (Type 003) and this aircraft in 2024.
Just bullshit. Os CV’s e os CVN da US Navy embarcavam cerca de 90 aeronaves no tempo da Guerra Fria. A única razão para os CVN não embarcarem actualmente um Air Wing maior é por opção. Em caso de conflito, os Air Wings podem facilmente ser reforçados, quer com aeronaves da USN quer com aeronaves dos Marines.
E convém recordar que os CV’s das classes Forrestal e Kitty Hawk tinham um deslocamento semelhante ou inferior ao Fujian.
Um Carrier Air Wing dos anos 80, 90 e 00 tinha a seguinte composição:
24 F-4/F-14/F/A-18
24 A-7/F/A-18
10 A-6
04 EA-6
04 KA-6
10 S-3
04 E-2
06 SH-3/SH-60
Novo porta-aviões
(https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Chinese-mystery-aircraft-carrier.jpg?w=1440&h=810)
https://www.twz.com/sea/chinas-wacky-and-puzzling-new-aircraft-carrier-has-set-sail (https://www.twz.com/sea/chinas-wacky-and-puzzling-new-aircraft-carrier-has-set-sail)
Novo porta-aviões
(https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Chinese-mystery-aircraft-carrier.jpg?w=1440&h=810)
https://www.twz.com/sea/chinas-wacky-and-puzzling-new-aircraft-carrier-has-set-sail (https://www.twz.com/sea/chinas-wacky-and-puzzling-new-aircraft-carrier-has-set-sail)
Foi apresentado como sendo um Porta Drones por variadíssimos canais.
Eu sinceramente não vejo qual é a vantagem da RPC em invadir Taiwan mais a mais quando são os reis do pragmatismo.
Invadindo Taiwan perdem os semicondutores produzidos na ilha (não estou a ver os Ilhéus a entregar essa indústria de mão beijada), os investimentos de Taiwan na mainland, além das repercussões negativas a nível global.
Na minha profunda ignorância acho que ficam muito melhores como as coisas estão. Pragmatismo e negócios.