Exército dos EUA

  • 475 Respostas
  • 161933 Visualizações
*

olisipo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 4966
  • Recebeu: 111 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 45 vez(es)
  • +28/-32
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #180 em: Abril 02, 2015, 05:30:14 pm »
US Specials Operations to have sole-source 2,000 ATVs



US Special Operations Command (SOCOM) is making a sole-source purchase of 2,000 light tactical all terrain vehicles (ATVs) from Polaris Industries. The contract includes 1,750 of the Medina, Minnesota-based company's four-seat MRZR-4 and 300 of its two-seat MRZR-2. SOCOM indicated it selected the vehicles because they can be transported inside the Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey, Boeing MH-47 special operations helicopter and Sikorsky MH-53 Pave Low and that they can be dropped from the air.

Polaris, whose core business is recreational vehicles, has several ATVs modified for military operations. It unveiled its first purpose-built military project vehicle last year, the DAGOR, which can transport a nine-person military squad or carry 3,,250 pounds of payload.
 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12773
  • Recebeu: 3106 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7616 vez(es)
  • +804/-1321
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #181 em: Abril 05, 2015, 02:20:31 am »
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20259
  • Recebeu: 2991 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2243 vez(es)
  • +1342/-3464
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #182 em: Abril 08, 2015, 11:30:16 am »
The Evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment, Post-9/11

The 75th Ranger Regiment was initially established during the Post-Vietnam War years, when the Army was seriously hurting. Rangers were to serve as role models, and set the example as Airborne Infantrymen who religiously attained and surpassed established standards. Before the War on Terror began, Rangers primarily focused on basic Infantry tasks such as ambushes, raids, and patrolling skills, with the additional responsibility of conducting airfield seizure missions.

There was the Regimental Standard Operating Procedures, or RSOP, a Blue Book that when combined with the Ranger Creed dictated pretty much every action a Ranger was to take or prohibited from taking. Load Carrying Equipment (LCE) had a tie down SOP, how jungle boots were worn had an SOP, how dog tags were taped together had an SOP. Discipline and adherence to the standards was paramount and most of the year Rangers would be training on post with occasional off-site training at the National Training Center (NTC) or Joint Readiness Exercise (JRX).

At this time the Regiment was a highly disciplined Airborne Light Infantry unit that trained for immediate short-notice world wide deployment. Like in Panama, Grenada, and to a lesser extent, Somalia, there was an expectation that Rangers would jump into future conflicts, conduct their missions, and catch the first flight back to the US. Training and SOP’s had grown out of these past conflicts, particularly Vietnam, and reflected the projected nature of future deployments.

Rangers during the Clinton years were not nearly as well funded as they should have been. They also had to fill the dual role of being the Army’s premier combat Infantry unit as well as setting a sterling example of discipline and professionalism for the rest of the Army. This meant that shinning boots and pressing uniforms were often as important as training for combat. Attempting to wear these two hats at once is an issue that the Regiment has always had to grapple with.

The 75th always has, and probably always will, be a high visibility unit.

Then 9/11 happened.

I arrived at 3/75 just as the battalion was coming back home, after jumping into Iraq during the opening salvo of OIF I. Of course it was disappointing to miss out on the invasion but I had some second thoughts when I saw dudes limping around on crutches with two broken ankles. They told me that they had been so loaded down with equipment during the combat jump that the static line hung at waist height.

This was 2003 and we were still being issued LCE’s which had to have pouches and canteens tied down with 550 chord (according to SOP) with the ends burned and melted to keep knots in place. However, no one used the LCE and it was being phased out. The MOLLE rucksack and riflemen’s kit was being issued. The rucksack, I shit you not, came with a VHS instructional video on how to put it all together. It also had a plastic frame which was laughable given how hard Rangers are on their equipment. The ruck sat at the bottom of everyone’s locker but the combat vest that it came with was used in substitution of the older LCE.

This was a strange time for Ranger battalion. Things were changing and not everyone was pleased. The standards were still being enforced, but these Rangers had been on real life combat deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq. Judging a man’s discipline by inspecting his haircut or how well his dog tags were taped together just didn’t seem as relevant anymore. When an NCO yelled that doing this-or-that is against the RSOP and will get you killed in combat, it just didn’t ring true to young Rangers who now wore CIB’s on their chest. This isn’t a positive attitude to have of course, but this clash between old school Rangers and new school Rangers was something that continued for years.

As a cherry Private, I got the impression that the Regiment was having something of an identity crisis. We were not counter-terrorist commandos but we were also not toy soldiers who spit polish boots for the parade ground. We were training for combat, but the training was not always reflecting what Rangers were being confronted with on the battlefield. Sometimes it seemed like maintaining a high and tight and a spotlessly clean rifle was the main focus of your day in Ranger battalion.

All of this would soon change. Future installments in this series will describe how the weapons, equipment, culture, selection process, and mission of the 75th Ranger Regiment evolved, particularly in the Post-9/11 years.

Read more: http://sofrep.com//sofrep.com/7276/the- ... z3WiCxCaBs
7. Todos os animais são iguais mas alguns são mais iguais que os outros.

 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20259
  • Recebeu: 2991 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2243 vez(es)
  • +1342/-3464
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #183 em: Abril 11, 2015, 04:31:15 pm »
7. Todos os animais são iguais mas alguns são mais iguais que os outros.

 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20259
  • Recebeu: 2991 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2243 vez(es)
  • +1342/-3464
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #184 em: Abril 15, 2015, 03:34:54 pm »
Army Equipment Program in support of President’s Budget 2016

 :arrow: http://www.g8.army.mil/0898A959-66BC-4F ... am2016.pdf
7. Todos os animais são iguais mas alguns são mais iguais que os outros.

 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20259
  • Recebeu: 2991 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2243 vez(es)
  • +1342/-3464
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #185 em: Maio 09, 2015, 06:17:59 pm »
The 30 Millimeter Solution: Army Upgunning Strykers Vs. Russia

Amidst rising anxieties over Russia, one of the last US combat units still based in Europe, the 2nd Cavalry Regiment, has asked for bigger guns. The House Armed Services Committee is already setting aside money for the urgent upgrade, which the Army staff officially approved yesterday in a memo obtained by Breaking Defense:



In brief, the 2nd Cavalry wants 81 of its eight-wheel-drive Stryker infantry carrier vehicles fitted with 30 millimeter automatic cannon. 30 mm is more than twice the caliber of the 12.7 mm machineguns those Strykers currently mount. It’s actually a bigger weapon than the notoriously destructive 25 mm chaingun on the much heavier M2 Bradley infantry carrier.

Adding a 30 mm weapon won’t make Strykers into tanks: An M1 Abrams’ main gun is a whopping 120 mm. But there are physical limits on what a 20-30 ton wheeled vehicle can accommodate. The Army spent years trying to fit a 105 mm cannon on a Stryker chassis, the Mobile Gun System (MGS). By contrast, 30 mm is a manageable size that would give the Strykers significant killing power against other light armored vehicles, such as Russian BMPs.

“MGS was a failure, which is why they stopped producing them,” one Hill staffer told me. “That said, MGS is better than nothing in terms of fire support.  These [proposed] 30mm remote weapon stations help quite a bit.”

The 2nd Cavalry wants the weapons because it’s the Army’s frontline force in Europe. There are only two US combat brigades still based on the continent, the 2nd Cav in Vilseck, Germany and the 173rd Airborne in Vicenza, Italy, a light infantry formation with very few vehicles of any kind and nothing as heavy as a Stryker. The Army has no heavy tank forces permanently stationed in Europe anymore, which the House Armed Services Committee has decried as “short-sighted.”

Since Russia seized Crimea, both the 2nd Cavalry and the 173rd Airborne have deployed to the Baltic States to deter aggression and reassure those small, exposed NATO allies. (The 173rd has even trained some Ukrainian forces). Just a month ago, a 60-Stryker task force of the 2nd Cavalry conducted an 1,100-plus mile “dragoon ride” back from the Baltics to Germany by way of Poland and the Czech Republic. The maneuver showed off the Stryker vehicles’ impressive mobility: As wheeled vehicles, they do better on long road marches than tracked tanks, although their performance is worse off-road. But clearly the Army thought they were lacking in lethality — and that’s what this upgrade is intended to correct.

The bigger question: Will the Army stop at upgrading 81 vehicles in Europe, or will it eventually seek funding to install the 30 mm weapons on Strykers in other theaters such as the Pacific. The memo pledges that the powerful Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) will study “potential application… across the broader Stryker force.” With the national strategy emphasizing crisis response and “expeditionary” forces, the Army is increasingly looking for armored vehicles light enough to rapidly deploy by air — but still heavily armed enough to fight on arrival.

 :arrow: http://breakingdefense.com/2015/04/the- ... vs-russia/
7. Todos os animais são iguais mas alguns são mais iguais que os outros.

 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12773
  • Recebeu: 3106 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7616 vez(es)
  • +804/-1321
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #186 em: Maio 18, 2015, 10:59:47 am »
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12773
  • Recebeu: 3106 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7616 vez(es)
  • +804/-1321
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #187 em: Maio 18, 2015, 10:08:10 pm »
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12773
  • Recebeu: 3106 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7616 vez(es)
  • +804/-1321
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #188 em: Maio 31, 2015, 06:37:31 pm »
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12773
  • Recebeu: 3106 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7616 vez(es)
  • +804/-1321
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #189 em: Junho 01, 2015, 10:40:17 pm »
The U.S. Army rolled out its plan today to outfit every soldier with Army Combat Uniforms in the new Operational Camouflage Pattern



http://kitup.military.com/2015/06/army- ... more-29849
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #190 em: Junho 03, 2015, 10:30:53 am »
https://www.facebook.com/fortbenningfans?pnref=story
Citar
Here are the latest guidlines on the new Army Combat Uniform.






Cumprimentos
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20259
  • Recebeu: 2991 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2243 vez(es)
  • +1342/-3464
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #191 em: Junho 04, 2015, 02:24:40 pm »
The end of the first female Ranger experiment

The Army announced that the last of the female candidates for Ranger school have failed the first experiment. Of course, according to the Christian Science Monitor, this has sparked a debate about whether or not the standard is realistic.

The Rangers are the best of the best, and being a Ranger means passing a physical test that pushes body and mind to the breaking point. If women can’t do it, the argument goes, then they shouldn’t be Rangers.

But there is another opinion quietly being voiced as well: that Ranger School is more akin to a rite of passage – an opportunity for men to “thump their chest,” as one Ranger puts it – than a realistic preparation for leading in war. That women can actually make Ranger units more effective. And that the standards that keep them out are outdated.

Of course, I predicted this debate when the idea was floated about allowing women into the elite forces – that when women didn’t meet the minimum standard, it would be because the standard was unrealistic. That’s why I was pulling for one or several women who would complete the school successfully at the current standard. The whole point for Ranger School is not create chest-thumping neanderthals, it’s to create or test leaders under combat conditions without an actual enemy shooting at them. It is to create conditions that test a student’s ability to successfully complete the mission even though he, and his subordinates, are exhausted, famished, and sore.

Rangers have to be able to operate at 100% far from any other American troops, with all of their equipment to survive and fight on their backs and their only means of arriving at the battle or the objective of their mission is their own two feet. So where do you compromise the standard?

Of course, Ray Mabus, the Navy Secretary, is ready to throw the SEALs under the bus;

Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus told the Navy Times this week that once women start attending SEAL training, it would make sense to examine the standards. “First, we’re going to make sure there are standards. Second, that they are gender-neutral, and third, that they have something to do with the job,” he said.

Why would there be a standard if it had nothing to do with the job? Obviously, Mabus doesn’t know what he’s talking about. But we knew that from some of his other stupid decisions in that job.

All 20 of the women who took part in this experiment have nothing to be ashamed about. A lot of men didn’t make the standard right along side of them. I hope and encourage the Army to continue to allow women to try and make the standard, but a lot of soldiers depend on the current standard to be led by only the best graduates of those schools and lowering the standard has nothing to do with chest-thumping and everything to do with bringing soldiers home safely from war.

 :arrow: http://thisainthell.us/blog/?p=60104
7. Todos os animais são iguais mas alguns são mais iguais que os outros.

 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #192 em: Junho 08, 2015, 03:29:00 pm »
http://www.janes.com/article/51988/us-army-once-again-seeks-new-ifv-designs
Citar
The US Army has awarded about USD57 million between BAE Systems Land and Armaments and General Dynamics Land Systems for conceptual design work on a future fighting vehicle (FFV) that could potentially replace the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle.

Work on this effort is to run through November 2016.

"As part of the FFV Phase 1 effort, General Dynamics will develop design concepts for the next-generation Infantry Fighting Vehicle [IFV]," the company said in a 2 June statement. It will "conduct trade studies, requirements analysis, modelling and simulation [M&S], and assess technology capability and maturity to support each of the three design concepts".

General Dynamics was awarded USD28.267 million and BAE Systems was awarded USD28.868 million, both are cost-plus-fixed-fee multi-year incrementally funded contracts, according to a 29 May Pentagon announcement. All of BAE Systems' contract was obligated at the time from fiscal year 2014 (FY 2014) and FY 2015 research and development funding, and USD20 million of the General Dynamics contract was obligated from the same accounts.

In FY 2016 the army has requested USD49.3 million to research and develop FFV technologies; according to IHS Jane's analysis this represents just 0.21% of all vehicle modernisation spending in the budget proposal.

Citar
The Bradley, in service since the early 1980s, exceeds its size, weight, power, and cooling limits, but the proven IFV fills a niche within the army's portfolio and requires improvements to maintain it. Source: BAE Systems

Saudações
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

Menacho

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 2815
  • Recebeu: 302 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 60 vez(es)
  • +6/-50
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #193 em: Junho 08, 2015, 05:22:49 pm »
El US Army se entrena en Almería con la Legión Espanhola




Citar
(defensa.com) Con la llegada el 4 de junio de 150 efectivos del US Army (Ejército de Tierra de los estados Unidos), ha comenzado la fase principal de un ejercicio conjunto de entrenamiento entre fuerzas de la Brigada de la Legión del ET (Ejército de Tierra) español y las de los Estados Unidos bajo las órdenes del US Africa Command (AFRICOM).  Es más que habitual ver a las fuerzas del USMC (US Marine Corp) estacionados en Morón de la Frontera (Sevilla) entrenándose con fuerzas españoles, pero en este caso hablamos de efectivos del US Army asignados al 4th Batallón, 6th Regimiento de Infantería, 3rd Brigade, una Unidad asignada a la 1st División Acorazadas de los Estados Unidos.

Los militares estadounidenses llegaron al aeropuerto de Almería, el más cercano a los acuartelamientos de la Legión sitos a Viator, que es la base de la Brigada de la Legión, a bordo de un Boeing 767 de la compañía comercial Omni. La aeronave realizó un vuelo directo desde Texas, dado que desde 2011 la División está basada en Fort Bliss, una gigantesca base militar cuyas zonas de instrucción se adentran en el colindante Estado de Nuevo Mexico, que fue cuando regresó a Estados Unidos tras estar 40 años basada en Alemania.    

A las tropas del US Army se sumaran más de 25 Marines pertenecientes a la fuerza basada en Morón, el SP-MAGTF CR (Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response/ Fuerza de Tarea Aire-Tierra de Especial Propósito para Respuesta a las Crisis) que compartirán jornadas de intenso adiestramiento con las fuerzas de la VIII Bandera del Tercio Juan de Austria 3º de la Legión en las zonas de instrucción, incluido sus campo de tiro, con las que cuenta la citada base Álvarez de Sotomayor de Viator.  Está previsto que en la fase final del ejercicio que se desarrolla entre los días 7 y 17 de junio entre las citadas fuerzas de la Legión y  de la 1st División Blindada se incorporen aparatos Bell/Boeing M-22B Osprey del VMM-266, actualmente asignados al SP-MAGTF CR de los Marines. Con estos aparatos se realizaran prácticas de asalto aéreo conjunto que completaran la exigente instrucción conjunta, que constará de prácticas de  combate diurno y nocturno y fuego real. (Julio Maíz Sanz)
 

*

olisipo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 4966
  • Recebeu: 111 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 45 vez(es)
  • +28/-32
Re: Exército dos EUA
« Responder #194 em: Junho 14, 2015, 10:59:18 am »
U.S. is Poised to Put Heavy Weaponry in Eastern Europe



Stryker vehicles from the Army's 2nd Cavalry Regiment took part in a military exercise in Riga, Latvia

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/14/world ... urope.html

Citar
In a significant move to deter possible Russian aggression in Europe, the Pentagon is poised to store battle tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and other heavy weapons for as many as 5.000 American troops in several Baltic and Eastern European countries, American and allied officials say.

The proposal, if approved, would represent the first time since the end of the Cold War that the United States have stationed heavy military equipment in the new Nato member nations in Eastern Europe that had once been part of the Soviet sphere of influence. Russia's annexation of Crimea and the war in eastern Ukraine have caused alarm and prompted new military planning in NATO capitals.

It would be the most prominent of a series of movements the United States and NATO have taken to bolster forces in the region and send a clear message of resolve to allies and to Russia's president, Vladimir V. Putin, that the United States would defend the Alliance's members closest to the Russian frontier  (...) continua