Mensagens recentes

Páginas: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
Força Aérea Portuguesa / Re: Substituição dos Falcon 50
« Última mensagem por Charlie Jaguar em Hoje às 05:24:47 pm »
Mais 4M€ para a frota Falcon 50 & 900.

Citar
Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 3/2026, de 13 de janeiro

Autoriza a Força Aérea a assumir o encargo plurianual e a realizar a despesa relativa à aquisição de Serviços de Suporte Logístico para os Sistemas de Armas FALCON, para os anos 2026 e 2027.

(...) 1 - Autorizar a Força Aérea a assumir o encargo plurianual e a realizar a despesa relativa à aquisição de Serviços de Suporte Logístico para os Sistemas de Armas FALCON, para o período compreendido entre 1 de janeiro de 2026 e 31 de dezembro de 2027, até ao montante máximo de € 4 065 040,65, ao qual acresce o imposto sobre o valor acrescentado (IVA), à taxa legal em vigor. (...)

https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/resolucao-conselho-ministros/3-2026-1005948602
2
Conflitos do Presente / Re: Gronelândia: Apetites Laranjas
« Última mensagem por Cabeça de Martelo em Hoje às 05:17:54 pm »


Citação de: Ulf Kristersson
Several officers from the Swedish Armed Forces are arriving in Greenland today. They are part of a group from several allied countries. Together, they will prepare for upcoming elements within the framework of the Danish exercise Operation Arctic Endurance. It is at Denmark's request that Sweden is sending personnel from the Armed Forces.
3
Força Aérea Portuguesa / Re: Substituiçao dos F-16's
« Última mensagem por Lampuka em Hoje às 04:33:04 pm »
Parece que a Ursula & companhia acordaram para a vida...
O SAFE 2 é inevitável e deverá estar para breve.
E o tom dos EUA mantém-se...
Que a FAP tenha inteligência e pragmatismo e prepare o necessário rapidamente,  senão a Marinha volta a levar a maioria do bolo.
Vamos lá ver se não anunciam já hoje...
4
Marinha Portuguesa / Re: Substituição das Fragatas Classe Vasco da Gama
« Última mensagem por P44 em Hoje às 04:08:50 pm »
É a Meloni a cá vir assinar o contrato... etc!  :mrgreen:

Ui

Haverá sessão de autógrafos? 😬🤭
5
Forças Aéreas/Sistemas de Armas / Re: Força Aérea Indiana
« Última mensagem por Cabeça de Martelo em Hoje às 02:44:02 pm »
Citação de: Ninjamonkey 🇮🇳
Some more details on the #India #France #Rafale agreement from #French media reports .
1) 35 #Indian #Rafale to be upgraded from F3R standard to F4 standard (Yes, means one was lost) .
2) 90 F4 #Rafale to be #MakeInIndia .
3) 24 F5 #Rafale to be Made in #France .
4) Future upgrade of the 90 F4 jets to F5 under discussions.

MOU likely to be signed during visit of #EmmanuelMacron to #Delhi in February .

The F5 #Rafale is the most interesting thing here because it will provide #India a doorway into the next gen AI assisted stealth collaborative  combat capability being developed by
@Dassault_OnAir where the F5 #Rafale will be able to fly "dark" using an enhanced optronic sensor & IRST while undertaking deep strike assisted by a Stealth "flying wingman" that will undertake strike missions for it using an AI model called Harmattan .


Will give #India a window into next generation #European electronic stealth  combat capacity .

The #Indian & #French sides have reached an agreement to consider aircraft with significant #Indian input as #MakeInIndia regardless of the final assembly location . In this context as all 90 Jets will have fuselages & other equipment made here they will be 30%+ #Indian in origin .

That remains to be finalized , the #Indian side insists it can be done & that #france must commit to the same . The @SAFRAN M88 T-REX has the same dimensions as the existing M-88 & is in fact 20% lighter due to higher use of lighter super alloys giving it better performance.

 The #French have still not agreed to this bit .

Factually even 30% is something few foreign manufacturers will allow their closest allies .
That said that is a beginning number with the #Rafale ecosystem already in #India & translates to some Rs 100,000cr + #investment into the #Indian #aviation sector . This will grow into over 65% by the time the deliveries are completed .

For context the Pakistani Chinese FC-1/JF17 has nearly nil Pakistani Input with even the stated 58% of airframe manufacturing at PAC Kamra using China sourced Raw material .
6
Conflitos do Passado e História Militar / Re: Panzer VI Tiger
« Última mensagem por Lusitano89 em Hoje às 02:22:03 pm »
O tanque TIGER podia mesmo operar SUBMERSO?


7
Exércitos/Sistemas de Armas / Re: Exército Britânico
« Última mensagem por Duarte em Hoje às 01:00:25 pm »
8
Conflitos do Presente / Re: Invasão da Ucrânia
« Última mensagem por Duarte em Hoje às 12:56:48 pm »
9
Espanha / Re: Notícias Geopolíticas da Espanha
« Última mensagem por Cabeça de Martelo em Hoje às 12:49:56 pm »
10
Mundo / Re: União Europeia
« Última mensagem por Cabeça de Martelo em Hoje às 12:37:38 pm »
EU may need 100,000-strong army, says defense commissioner
Andrius Kubilius says the EU needs to reform the way it handles defense at the political level, too — and that the U.K. should get a seat at the table.

January 12, 2026 2:29 am CET
By Joe Stanley-Smith
European Union Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius has said the bloc should consider establishing a standing military force of 100,000 troops and overhaul the political processes governing defense.

Faced with Russian aggression and the U.S. shifting its focus away from Europe and threatening Greenland, Kubilius argued for a “big bang” approach to re-imagining Europe’s common defense.

“Would the United States be militarily stronger if they would have 50 armies on the States level instead of a single federal army,” he said at a Swedish security conference on Sunday. “Fifty state defence policies and defense budgets on the states level, instead of a single federal defense policy and budget?”

“If our answer is 'no,’ [the] USA would not be stronger, then — what are we waiting for?”

Kubilius said Europe's defense readiness depends on three pillars: more investment in production capacity; institutions that are prepared and organized; and the political will to deter and, if needed, fight.

Merely increasing funding for Europe’s existing defense setup won’t meet these requirements, he said, in part because of a lack of unity.

"We need to start to invest our money in such a way, that we would be able to fight as Europe, not just as collection of 27 national ‘bonsai armies’,” he said, borrowing a phrase from former EU High Representative Josep Borrell.

Europe could instead create — "as Jean-Claude Juncker, Emmanuel Macron, Angela Merkel already proposed 10 years ago" a powerful, standing “European military force” of 100,000 troops, he said.

To help solve the issue of political will, Kubilius wants to establish a European Security Council. The idea has been talked up by French President Macron and former German Chancellor Merkel.

“The European Security Council could be composed of key permanent members, along with several rotational members, including the member state with the Council presidency,” said Kubilius. “Plus the leadership of the EU: Commission and Council presidents.”

The proposed security council should also include the United Kingdom, Kubilius said.

“In total around 10-12 members, with the task to discuss the most important issues in defense, some of which I just mentioned before,” Kubilius said. “And not only discussing, but also swiftly preparing important decisions.”

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-needs-100000-strong-army-defense-commissioner-andrius-kubilius-military-overhaul/
Páginas: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10