U. S. Navy

  • 851 Respostas
  • 278176 Visualizações
*

P44

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 18015
  • Recebeu: 5409 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 5717 vez(es)
  • +7064/-9429
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #480 em: Agosto 21, 2017, 10:46:27 am »
USS John S. McCain (DDG-56),an Alreigh Burke Class Destroyer, collided with a tanker east of Singapore, 10 missing, 5 injured.

VIDEO
https://twitter.com/miladvisor/status/899541228869611521
"[Os portugueses são]um povo tão dócil e tão bem amestrado que até merecia estar no Jardim Zoológico"
-Dom Januário Torgal Ferreira, Bispo das Forças Armadas
 

*

Viajante

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 4284
  • Recebeu: 2412 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1394 vez(es)
  • +7332/-4426

*

Crypter

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 1207
  • Recebeu: 204 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 233 vez(es)
  • +29/-7
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #482 em: Agosto 21, 2017, 11:44:26 am »
Outra vez??!?

Mas esta malta anda a dormir ou quê?
 
Os seguintes utilizadores agradeceram esta mensagem: Lusitano89, perdadetempo

*

Viajante

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 4284
  • Recebeu: 2412 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1394 vez(es)
  • +7332/-4426
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #483 em: Agosto 21, 2017, 12:12:44 pm »
 

*

Lusitano89

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20613
  • Recebeu: 2392 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 257 vez(es)
  • +1118/-1481
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #484 em: Agosto 21, 2017, 05:50:10 pm »
 

*

perdadetempo

  • Analista
  • ***
  • 611
  • Recebeu: 234 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 457 vez(es)
  • +59/-6
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #485 em: Agosto 21, 2017, 08:33:17 pm »
Outra vez??!?

Mas esta malta anda a dormir ou quê?

Talvez o currículo do capitão e do imediato expliquem melhor o problema:

O capitão
The Co's: O Comandante Sanchez frequentou o Naval War College e obteve um Mestrado em Segurança Nacional e Estudos Estratégicos. Mais tarde, ele serviu como Assistente do comandante Navy Air e Missile Defense Command, Dahlgren, VA. O Comandante Sanchez recentemente completou uma comissão de serviço na Equipe Conjunta como Desk Officer no Egipto na Diretoria de Estratégia e Política (J5) do Médio Oriente.

o imediato
The Xo: (piloto de mesa) Durante o seu tempo em terra, o CDR Sanchez serviu como Comandante da Unidade de Montagem de Minas Móveis 10 em Okinawa, Oficial responsável pelo Comando de Munições da Marinha Divisão da Ásia Oriental Det. Okinawa, oficial encarregado do Centro de Sistemas de Combate de Superfície Det. Mayport e comandante do Centro de Apoio Operacional da Marinha em Las Vegas, Nevada. Ele possui um AAS em tecnologia eletromecânica, uma licenciatura em artes liberais, ambos do Excelsior College e um mestrado em segurança nacional e estudos estratégicos do Naval War College.
(traducções do Google Tradutor)

Ambos os indivíduos têm o apelido Sanchez  não é gralha.

Citar
David_Davila
5h

Not a lot of at sea experience that I see here:

The Xo’s quals: (desk pilot) During his shore tours, CDR Sanchez served as Commanding Officer for Mobile Mine Assembly Unit 10 in Okinawa, Officer-in-Charge of Navy Munitions Command East Asia Division Det. Okinawa, Officer-in-Charge of Center for Surface Combat Systems Det. Mayport, and Commanding Officer for Navy Operational Support Center in Las Vegas, Nevada. He holds an AAS in Electro-mechanical Technology, a BS in Liberal Arts, both from Excelsior College, and a MA in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College.

The Co’s: Commander Sanchez attended the Naval War College, and obtained a Master of Arts Degree in National Security and Strategic Studies. He later served as the Aide to the Commander Navy Air and Missile Defense Command, Dahlgren, VA. Commander Sanchez most recently completed a tour on the Joint Staff as the Egypt Desk Officer in the Strategy and Policy (J5) Middle East directorate.
http://forum.gcaptain.com/t/uss-j-mccain-alnic-mc-collision-near-singapore/45819/52

Cumprimentos,
 

*

Lusitano89

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20613
  • Recebeu: 2392 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 257 vez(es)
  • +1118/-1481
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #486 em: Agosto 22, 2017, 07:36:07 pm »
Encontrados os corpos de "alguns" marinheiros desaparecidos


 

*

Lusitano89

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20613
  • Recebeu: 2392 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 257 vez(es)
  • +1118/-1481
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #487 em: Agosto 23, 2017, 08:23:38 pm »
Marinha dos EUA afasta o comandante da 7.ª Esquadra do Pacífico



 

*

Lusitano89

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20613
  • Recebeu: 2392 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 257 vez(es)
  • +1118/-1481
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #488 em: Agosto 24, 2017, 12:16:31 am »
 

*

jpthiran

  • Perito
  • **
  • 361
  • Recebeu: 95 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 119 vez(es)
  • +19/-11
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #489 em: Agosto 25, 2017, 12:21:41 am »
Boa noite.

Alguém sabe explicar como é que é possível isto acontecer?

Obrigado,

Jean-Pierre.
 

*

Lusitano89

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20613
  • Recebeu: 2392 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 257 vez(es)
  • +1118/-1481
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #490 em: Agosto 28, 2017, 03:23:20 pm »
Boa noite.

Alguém sabe explicar como é que é possível isto acontecer?

Obrigado,

Jean-Pierre.


Segundo avança o jornal New York Times, vários oficiais contactados dão conta de que os acidentes do Pacífico terão sido causados por problemas que persistiram apesar dos repetidos avisos dos órgãos de fiscalização do Congresso e dos próprios especialistas da Marinha. Entre os problemas referenciados estão a falta de manutenção da frota, ausência de treinamento especializado, horários de vigilância rigorosos, trabalho sobre condições de grande stress e foco apenas em missões navais imediatas.

“O que parece impossível – que dois navios possam colidir no meio do oceano – tornou-se muito real”, afimou Robert McFall, um antigo tenente-comandante da Marinha, que serviu como oficial de operações do destroyer Fitzgerald em 2014. “Se as pessoas não estiverem no seu melhor estado, os eventos podem começar o seu caminho até ao desastre”.


>>>>  http://www.jornaleconomico.sapo.pt/noticias/colisoes-no-pacifico-marinha-ja-tinha-alertado-para-problemas-de-seguranca-com-a-frota-naval-dos-eua-201834?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12750
  • Recebeu: 3088 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7581 vez(es)
  • +770/-1303
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #491 em: Agosto 28, 2017, 04:47:59 pm »
Deve ser como aquela anedota do farol que tinha de se desviar da frota...  :N-icon-Axe: :N-icon-Axe: :N-icon-Axe:
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

P44

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 18015
  • Recebeu: 5409 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 5717 vez(es)
  • +7064/-9429
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #492 em: Agosto 28, 2017, 05:06:59 pm »
Também li algures que com as novas tecnologias Stealth se torna muito mais dificil aos radares de navios civis detetarem navios de guerra, e que para além disso, a USN navega com os equivalentes maritimos aos "transponders" dos avioes desligados, nao sei se é verdade ou mentira ou estou a dizer uma grande borrada  :-X
"[Os portugueses são]um povo tão dócil e tão bem amestrado que até merecia estar no Jardim Zoológico"
-Dom Januário Torgal Ferreira, Bispo das Forças Armadas
 
Os seguintes utilizadores agradeceram esta mensagem: Lusitano89

*

P44

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 18015
  • Recebeu: 5409 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 5717 vez(es)
  • +7064/-9429
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #493 em: Agosto 28, 2017, 05:07:25 pm »

European Naval Shipbuilders Weighing their Options for US Navy FFG(X) Program

 
Most major European naval shipbuilding companies are closely reviewing their options for the U.S. Navy FFG(X) program. Contacted by Navy Recognition, BAE Systems (United Kingdom), Naval Group (France), Fincantieri (Italy) and Navantia (Spain) acknowledged looking at the RFI. TKMS (Germany) and Damen (Netherlands) didn't return phone calls or emails.

The US Department of Defense released a Request for Information (RFI) in July this year to let the industry know what the U.S. Navy is expecting from the Fast Frigate, Guided (Experimental) or FFG(X). The RFI says, "A competition for FFG(X) is envisioned to consider existing parent designs for a Small Surface Combatant that can be modified to accommodate the specific capability requirements prescribed by the US Navy."

The U.S. Navy wants a frigate that can keep up with carrier strike groups as well as conduct missions on its own. “The FFG(X) will normally aggregate into strike groups and Large Surface Combatant led surface action groups but also possess the ability to robustly defend itself during conduct of independent operations while connected and contributing to the fleet tactical grid.” The U.S. Navy expects the frigate to be survivable in complex scenarios: "FFG(X) will perform its missions in complex electronic warfare and anti-ship missile threat environments".

The new Frigate would likely replace the troubled, very modular, Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) for typical "frigate missions". The U.S. Navy is requesting the FFG(X) to conduct the following missions:
- Over the horizon anti-surface warfare (ASuW )
- Anti-submarine warfare (ASW)
- Independently escort logistics ship convoys
- Electronic warfare (EW)
- Electronic signals intelligence and collection (ELINT)

The frigate displacement isn't mentionned in the RFI, but it is likely to be comprised between 4000 tons (if the design is to stay as close as possible to the LCS) and in excess of 6000 tons (in view of the requirements set by the U.S. Navy, which is particularly interested on how the shipbuilders can fit VLS for ESSM and Standard Missiles and how many).

The U.S. Navy intends to award a Detail Design and Construction contract for the first FFG(X) in 2020. The full RFI can be found at this link.

Possible European designs:

European shipbuilders that we contacted used broad terms such as "we are looking at the RFI", "we are considering the opportunity", "we are considering the option" or "we are debating it internally". While none of the four companies which talked to us went into specific ship design, here is our own speculation on the likely frigate designs to be proposed, should these companies answer the RFI.



Computer Generated Image of the BAE System's Global Combat Ship proposal for the Royal Australian Navy SEA 5000 program. BAE Systems image.
        
BAE Systems Type 26 Global Combat Ship
The Type 26 is the future ASW Frigate that will replace the Royal Navy's 13 Type 23 frigates and other ships. BAE Systems says the Type 26 / Global Combat Ship will be a highly capable and versatile multi-mission warship designed to support anti-submarine warfare, air defence and general purpose operations anywhere on the world’s oceans. First steel cut of the first frigate (Glasgow) for the Royal Navy took place in July this year. BAE Systems is also proposing the Type 26 in customized configurations to the Royal Canadian Navy (CSC program) and has been shortlisted for the Royal Australian Navy (SEA 5000 program) with an Australian CEA radar.

BAE Systems Global Combat Ship (Royal Navy City-class) specifications:
Length: 149.9 meters
Max beam: 20.8 meters
Displacement: 6,900 tons
Accommodation: 118 crew + 72 embarked forces



Artist Impression of DCNS proposal to the Royal Canadian Navy CSC requirement (FREMM Frigate in Air Defense variant based on the Aquitaine-class). Picture: Naval Group (DCNS)
        
Naval Group FREMM (Aquitaine-class)
The FREMM ("European multi-purpose frigate"; French: Frégate européenne multi-mission; Italian: Fregata europea multi-missione) is a class of multi-purpose frigates designed by Naval Group (formerly DCNS) and Fincantieri for the navies of France and Italy. In France the class is known as the Aquitaine-class. The FREMM was designed from the start by DCNS as a potent ASW platform with very low acoustic signature even at speed. Naval Group is also proposing the FREMM in a customized configuration to the Royal Canadian Navy (CSC program). Naval Group's FREMM has been exported to the Egyptian and Moroccan Navies.


Naval Group FREMM (French Navy Aquitaine-class) specifications:
Length: 142 meters
Max beam: 20 meters
Displacement: 6,000 tons
Accommodation: 108



FTI scale model at Euronaval 2016 on the French MoD stand.
        
Naval Group Belharra (FTI-class)
Unveiled at Euronaval 2016, the Belharra is the successor of the La Fayette-class. The French Defence Ministry announced the attribution to DCNS (now Naval Group) of a contract for the development and construction of five FTI (Frégate de Taille Intermédiaire or mid-size frigate) surface combatant intended for the French Navy in April this year. The first of the five frigates should be delivered in 2023 with an entry into active duty in 2025. Naval Group say that Belharra is their answer to navies looking for a compact frigate able to perform a wide range of missions, both stand-alone or within a task force, either for long-range missions on the high seas or shallow-water operations in a congested and contested operational environment. This new frigate features high-level capabilities in anti-air, anti-surface, anti-submarine and asymmetric warfare domains.

Naval Group Belharra (French Navy FTI program) specifications:
Length: 122.25 meters
Max beam: 17.70 meters
Displacement: 4,250 tons
Accommodation: 125



Fincantieri SEA5000 proposal is based on the Italian Navy FREMM ASW design
        
Fincantieri FREMM (Bergamini-class & Virginio Fasan-class)
The FREMM ("European multi-purpose frigate"; French: Frégate européenne multi-mission; Italian: Fregata europea multi-missione) is a class of multi-purpose frigates designed by Naval Group (formerly DCNS) and Fincantieri for the navies of France and Italy. The Italian Navy opted for two variants: A general purpose one known as the Bergamini-class and an ASW variant known as the Virginio Fasan-class. A proposal based on the later has been shortlisted for the Royal Australian Navy (SEA 5000 program) with an Australian CEA radar.

Fincantieri FREMM baseline specifications:
Length: 144 meters
Max beam: 19.70 meters
Displacement: abt 6,500 tons
Accommodation: 145 crew (total 200)



PPA Scale model at Euronaval 2016.
        
Fincantieri Multipurpose Offshore Patrol Ship (PPA-class)
PPA, Pattugliatore Polivalente d'Altura (Offshore Multipurpose Patrol Ship) is a new Frigate class of the Marina Militare. It is planned to replace eight Minerva class corvettes, four Comandanti class patrol vessels, two Sirio class patrol vessels and four Cassiopea class patrol vessels The PPA, first of seven units, will be delivered in 2021 and it is part of the renewal plan of the operational lines of the Italian Navy vessels, approved by the Government and Parliament and started in May 2015. There will be three variants: PPA Light, PPA Light+ and PPA Full. According to Fincantieri, the multipurpose offshore patrol vessel is a highly flexible ship with the capacity to serve multiple functions, ranging from patrol with sea rescue capacity to Civil Protection operations and, in its most highly equipped version, first line fighting vessel. PPA Full is even set to become an ABM capable vessel.

Fincantieri Multipurpose Offshore Patrol Ship (Italian Navy PPA program) baseline specifications:
Length: 143 meters
Max beam: 16.50 meters
Displacement: abt 5,000 tons
Accommodation: from 90 (+30) to 171 (+30)



Navantia's SEA5000 proposal is based on the Hobart class Air Warfare Destroyer design.
        
Navantia F100 (Álvaro de Bazán-class)
The Álvaro de Bazán-class (also known as the F100 class of frigates) was designed and built by Spanish shipbuilder Navantia for the Spanish Navy. It is fitted with the US Aegis combat system and AN/SPY-1 radar. Norway's Fridtjof Nansen-class and Australia's Hobart-class are both based on the F-100. A proposal based on the Hobart-class has also been shortlisted for the Royal Australian Navy (SEA 5000 program) with an Australian CEA radar.

Navantia SEA5000 proposal specifications:
Original design: RAN Hobart-class AWD
Length overall: 147.2 m
Max beam: 18.6 m
End of life displacement: 7400 t
Accommodation: 237



Image source: Spanish Navy/Navantia
        
Navantia F110
The Spanish Navy will be replacing the Santa Maria class FFG Frigate with F-110 Frigates around 2025. The F-110 Frigate is not only focused on substituting the functionality of the "Santa Maria" class but also in providing solutions to facing latest threats and performing future expected missions. From the start of the program, Navantia has been cooperating closely with the Spanish Navy in the requirements for a 21st century frigate and in 2015 Navantia signed a contract with the Spanish MoD for the development of the project definition phase. In parallel, a suite of technological R&D programs have been initiated looking to acquire the latest innovations to be incorporated in the F-110 program. There are 5 units of the class planned with launch of the first unit expected for 2021.

Navantia F110 specifications:
Length overall: 145 meters
Max beam: 18 meters
Displacement: 6,100 t
Accommodation: 150

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/focus-analysis/naval-technology/5515-european-naval-shipbuilders-weighing-their-options-for-us-navy-ffg-x-program.html
"[Os portugueses são]um povo tão dócil e tão bem amestrado que até merecia estar no Jardim Zoológico"
-Dom Januário Torgal Ferreira, Bispo das Forças Armadas
 

*

Lightning

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 11017
  • Recebeu: 2330 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 3207 vez(es)
  • +731/-1031
Re: U. S. Navy
« Responder #494 em: Agosto 29, 2017, 01:23:09 pm »
Porque andam os navios de guerra americanos a chocar no Pacífico?

https://www.publico.pt/2017/08/23/mundo/noticia/por-que-andam-os-navios-de-guerra-americanos-andam-a-chocar-no-pacifico-1783157

Citar
A culpa é de Donald Trump que não sabe o que quer? Ou é de Barack Obama, que começou a fazer cortes no orçamento da Marinha, que se queixa de não ter dinheiro para missões mais curtas e reparações mais frequentes nos navios? A culpa é da atitude dos marinheiros americanos, que pensam que o sinal verde está sempre aberto para eles e não cumprem as regras de navegação? Ou é da falta de treino adequado para navegar na zona marítima com mais tráfego do mundo?

Citar
porque estão os seus navios de guerra, com reputação de serem os mais poderosos e mais bem equipados do mundo, a colidir com cargueiros, petroleiros, barcos de pesca e até paredes?
 
Os seguintes utilizadores agradeceram esta mensagem: perdadetempo