Royal Navy

  • 673 Respostas
  • 214686 Visualizações
*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #285 em: Fevereiro 13, 2017, 11:26:12 am »
Esperemos que o Lynx ou o Merlim esteja sempre operacional para pelo menos chatear os submarinos russos do mar negro...  ;D ;)




Saudações

"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #286 em: Fevereiro 19, 2017, 02:08:52 pm »
Se fossemos lá buscar uns 3 ficava feliz...  :D ;)

Citar
http://www.cavok.com.br/blog/marinha-real-prepara-se-para-dar-adeus-ao-lynx/




Cumprimentos
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

P44

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 18279
  • Recebeu: 5530 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 5940 vez(es)
  • +7156/-9535
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #287 em: Fevereiro 22, 2017, 12:44:48 pm »
RFA Gold Rover, irmao do Bérrio, entra em Portsmouth após a sua última viagem:
https://twitter.com/HMSWarrior1860/status/834347970384506881

« Última modificação: Fevereiro 22, 2017, 12:47:51 pm por P44 »
"[Os portugueses são]um povo tão dócil e tão bem amestrado que até merecia estar no Jardim Zoológico"
-Dom Januário Torgal Ferreira, Bispo das Forças Armadas
 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #288 em: Abril 01, 2017, 11:02:08 am »
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/type-26-frigate-asw-platform/?utm_source=FB&utm_medium=FacebookPage&utm_campaign=social
Citar
The Type 26 will undoubtedly be the most capable ASW afloat, arriving early next decade. But it’s so much more than an ASW platform, with the ability to take Tomahawk strike missiles, a 5-inch gun and a considerable local area defence capability; and the mission bay, which can take a whole range of mission support packages.”

Despite recent sensationalism in the press, the Type 26 Frigate fleet will be armed with Sea Ceptor missiles with additional types to be carried decided at a later date.


Cumprimentos
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

P44

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 18279
  • Recebeu: 5530 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 5940 vez(es)
  • +7156/-9535
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #289 em: Abril 01, 2017, 11:45:08 am »
"[Os portugueses são]um povo tão dócil e tão bem amestrado que até merecia estar no Jardim Zoológico"
-Dom Januário Torgal Ferreira, Bispo das Forças Armadas
 

*

Cabeça de Martelo

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 20259
  • Recebeu: 2991 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 2243 vez(es)
  • +1342/-3464
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #290 em: Abril 01, 2017, 11:57:46 am »
7. Todos os animais são iguais mas alguns são mais iguais que os outros.

 

*

tenente

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 10366
  • Recebeu: 5670 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 4363 vez(es)
  • +8478/-1842
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #291 em: Abril 03, 2017, 12:31:31 pm »
Nem tudo vai mal na RN pois em contrapartida......

https://navaltoday.com/2017/04/03/first-tide-class-tanker-reaches-uk-waters/

First Tide-class tanker reaches UK waters


RFA Tidespring is now docked in Falmouth ahead of her customization work. Photo: UK Ministry of Defence

RFA Tidespring, the lead ship of the new Tide-class tankers built for Great Britain by the South Korean shipbuilder Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, arrived in the UK on April 2.

Tidespring started her journey from South Korea in February after being officially accepted by the UK Ministry of Defence on January 12, 2017.

Tidespring was laid down in December 2014 and launched in April 2015. The tanker was expected to reach UK waters in 2016 for further outfitting but was delayed by electrical design changes and wiring issues.

RFA Tiderace, the second tanker in line, was unveiled in South Korea in December 2016. Despite the delays on the first vessel, the UK still expects to have all four tankers delivered by 2018.

BMT Defence Services-designed RFA Tidespring, RFA Tiderace, RFA Tidesurge and RFA Tideforce are 201 meters long, with a beam of nearly 29 meters and a displacement of more than 37,000 tonnes.

The tankers will maintain the Royal Navy’s ability to refuel at sea and will provide fuel to warships and task groups. They will support deployed amphibious, land and air forces close to the shore and will have the ability to operate helicopters.

“It’s fantastic to see that RFA TIDESPRING has arrived in the UK. As her designer, this is an extremely proud moment for everyone that has been involved in this project,” said Muir Macdonald, managing director of BMT Defence Services

Abraços
« Última modificação: Abril 03, 2017, 12:34:03 pm por tenente »
Quando um Povo/Governo não Respeita as Suas FFAA, Não Respeita a Sua História nem se Respeita a Si Próprio  !!
 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #292 em: Abril 30, 2017, 03:19:21 pm »
Os bifes e os "problemas existenciais". Projectos à pressão e o F35B, agora chucham no dedo...  :P ;)
Citar
Options to augment the capabilities of the Queen Elizabeth carriers in future, including shipborne air-to-air refuelling, are currently being explored by the MoD.
Asked by James Heappey, MP for the Wells:

“To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will examine options in SDSR 2020 to enable HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales to extend the effective combat radius of the F-35B through the introduction of a shipborne air-to-air refuelling capability.”

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/shipborne-air-air-refuelling-capability-explored-queen-elizabeth-carriers/?utm_source=FB&utm_medium=FacebookPage&utm_campaign=social





Cumprimentos
 
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

tenente

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 10366
  • Recebeu: 5670 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 4363 vez(es)
  • +8478/-1842
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #293 em: Abril 30, 2017, 04:15:15 pm »
Latest Royal Navy SSN, Audacious, Readied for Tomorrow’s Launch  (Source: compiled by Defense-Aerospace.com; posted April 28, 2017)


HMS Audacious, an Astute-class nuclear attack submarine, has left the covered hall in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, where she was built and is preparing for her floating out ceremony, scheduled for tomorrow, April 28. (BAE Systems photo)

 HMS Audacious, an Astute-class nuclear attack submarine, has left the covered hall in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, where it was built.

 The 7,400 tonne submarine, which costs over £1 billion, is pictured edging out of her dry dock at Barrow-in-Furness, earlier today as preparations began to prepare her for her floating-out ceremony, on Saturday April 29, during which she will finally enter the water.

 The future HMS Audacious is the fourth Astute-class boat commissioned by the British Government. Although the same design as her three sisters, Audacious will benefit from improvements identified during their build and trial to improve performance.

 The Astute Class is being built by BAE Systems, which employs around 8,000 people in its Submarines business, including those that work on the Astute programme, with thousands more working in the UK submarine supply chain.

 Featuring the latest nuclear-powered technology, the Astute class can circumnavigate the world submerged, manufacturing the crew’s oxygen from seawater as they go.

 They also have the ability to operate covertly and remain undetected in almost all circumstances despite being 50 per cent bigger than the Royal Navy’s current Trafalgar Class submarines, which are to be replaced by the Dreadnought class.

http://www.w54.biz/showthread.php?19-Royal-Navy-matters/page100

Abraços
« Última modificação: Abril 30, 2017, 04:19:58 pm por tenente »
Quando um Povo/Governo não Respeita as Suas FFAA, Não Respeita a Sua História nem se Respeita a Si Próprio  !!
 

*

HSMW

  • Moderador Global
  • *****
  • 12774
  • Recebeu: 3106 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 7616 vez(es)
  • +804/-1321
    • http://youtube.com/HSMW
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #294 em: Maio 01, 2017, 10:08:39 pm »
https://www.youtube.com/user/HSMW/videos

"Tudo pela Nação, nada contra a Nação."
 

*

tenente

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 10366
  • Recebeu: 5670 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 4363 vez(es)
  • +8478/-1842
Re: Royal Navy vai abater alguns NPO's Classe River
« Responder #295 em: Maio 02, 2017, 02:29:31 pm »
Se estes três NPO's custarem 20 Milhões, ou menos ainda vamos ás compras :G-beer2:
Deve ser a compra ideal para a nossa MdG, armamento principal uma 20mm, não possuem flight deck, nem hangar para o Heli, mas podem transportar equipamento mais pesado pois tem uma grua de 25 tons........ :G-beer2:

No entanto se apontarmos as batarias para o HMS Clyde, bem esse seria um possível mini LPD, podendo transportar 110 militares + crew e o flight deck pode operar um EH101, portanto fica mais baratinho. :banana: :banana: :banana:

Os quatro primeiros River's entraram ao serviço entre 2003 e 2007 !




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River-class_patrol_vessel#Disposal

River class OPV Batch 1

Tyne, Severn and Mersey[edit]

In early 2001, the Ministry of Defence placed an order with Vosper Thornycroft (VT) for three River-class offshore patrol vessels to replace the Island class.[2] It was understood that the higher availability rates of the River class (up to 300 days per year), would enable the three new ships to perform the duties of the five ships they replaced. The Royal Navy initially chartered (or leased) the ships under a five-year, £60 million contract from the builder VT.[2] As part of the contract, VT would be responsible for all maintenance and support during the charter period. This contract was renewed in January 2007 for another five years at £52 million.[2] However, in September 2012, instead of renewing the contract again, it was announced by the Defence Secretary Philip Hammond that the Ministry of Defence had purchased the vessels for £39 million.[2][10]

The River class are significantly larger than the Island-class vessels and have a large open deck aft allowing them to be fitted with equipment for a specific role, which can include fire-fighting, disaster relief and anti-pollution work. For this purpose, a 25 tonne capacity crane is fitted. In addition, the deck is strong enough for the transport of various tracked and wheeled light vehicles, or an LCVP. The class are primarily used with the Fishery Protection Squadron and EEZ patrol.[2]

In 2009, the running costs for the River class was estimated at £20 million: "The average running cost... of [the] River class is £20 million... These figures, based on the expenditure incurred by the Ministry of Defence in 2009–10, include maintenance, safety certification, military upgrades, manpower, inventory, satellite communication, fuel costs and depreciation."[11]

Clyde

In February 2005, the Ministry of Defence placed an order with VT for the charter of a fourth modified River-class offshore patrol vessel.[2] This fourth ship, Clyde, was constructed at Portsmouth Dockyard and replaced the two Castle-class patrol vessels for duties around the South Atlantic and the Falkland Islands. To fulfill this role, Clyde incorporates several modifications, including an extended length 81.5 m (267 ft 5 in) hull, a top speed of 21 kn (39 km/h), a 30 mm cannon, two miniguns and mountings for five general purpose machine guns.[2] Clyde's elongated hull permits a 20-metre strengthened flight deck able to accommodate a Merlin-sized helicopter. The ship has a full load displacement between 1,850[2] and 2,000 tonnes.[12][13]

Clyde is capable of temporarily embarking up to 110 troops and their equipment and inserting them anywhere on the Falkland Islands.[2] Clyde has a complement of 36.[2]

Disposal

On 24 April 2017, in a written answer to a question raised by Sir Nicholas Soames, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Defence Harriet Baldwin stated Severn would be decommissioned in 2017, with Mersey and Clyde following in 2019.[14] As of April 2017, no date has been given Tyne's decommissioning.



Abraços
« Última modificação: Maio 02, 2017, 02:55:28 pm por tenente »
Quando um Povo/Governo não Respeita as Suas FFAA, Não Respeita a Sua História nem se Respeita a Si Próprio  !!
 

*

tenente

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 10366
  • Recebeu: 5670 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 4363 vez(es)
  • +8478/-1842
Re: Royal Navy abate alguns Navios nos próximos anos
« Responder #296 em: Maio 02, 2017, 03:57:17 pm »
Aqui vai a noticia :

http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2017-04-18/71203

Ministry of DefenceWarships and Submarines: Decommissioning

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what Royal Navy ships and submarines have been decommissioned in each of the last five years; which are to be decommissioned over the next five years; and if he will make a statement.

A Answered by: Harriett Baldwin Answered on: 24 April 2017

I have interpreted “decommissioned” to mean withdrawn from service.
In relation to the Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels that have been withdrawn from service in the last five years, I refer my right hon. Friend to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Minister for Defence Personnel, Reserves and Veterans (Mark Lancaster) on 20 March 2017, to Question number 68186 to the hon. Member for Westmorland and Lonsdale (Tim Farron).

The ships that are programmed to be withdrawn from service over the next five years are listed in the table below. It should be noted that the dates may move depending on operational needs at that time.

Year     Ship
2017    RFA GOLD ROVER, HMS SEVERN
2018    HMS OCEAN
2019    HMS CLYDE, HMS MERSEY
2020
2021
-
In respect of submarines, I am withholding information on their programmed withdrawal from service dates as disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.

Abraços
Quando um Povo/Governo não Respeita as Suas FFAA, Não Respeita a Sua História nem se Respeita a Si Próprio  !!
 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #297 em: Maio 15, 2017, 11:13:47 am »
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/no-trident-doesnt-run-windows-xp/?utm_source=FB&utm_medium=FacebookPage&utm_campaign=social
Citar
No, Trident doesn’t run on Windows XP

Some have claimed that the Vanguard class submarines which carry Trident are vulnerable to cyber-attacks in the same way the recently hit NHS is, that is not the case.

Critics point to the Royal Navy’s decision to install a heavily adapted operating system, based off the same framework as Windows XP, as the operating system on its missile-carrying Vanguard class submarines. While some versions of Windows have long been criticised for unreliability, the variant installed on the submarine fleet is about as robust and reliable as they come, having no real practical similarity with Windows XP.

So reliable is the system that the operating system and its variants are widely used in commercial operations including manufacturing plants, labs and commercial ships. The Royal Navy has already installed similar systems in other ships and submarines.

Some have taken to using the recent attacks on the NHS as part of a campaign against Trident, albeit they’ve used the wrong information. While we have no position on renewing Trident, we do have a very strong position on facts being important.




Cumprimentos
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

mafets

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 8680
  • Recebeu: 3259 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 1002 vez(es)
  • +4063/-6485
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #298 em: Maio 26, 2017, 09:53:15 am »
Sei onde ficava bem...  :P ::) ;D ;)
Citar
HMS Severn, a River class offshore patrol vessel, will be be decommissioned by the end of this year, being replaced by HMS Forth.

In a written answer to a question raised by Sir Nicholas Soames, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Defence Harriet Baldwin stated HMS Severn would be decommissioned in 2017, with Mersey and Clyde following in 2019. As of April 2017, no date has been given Tyne’s decommissioning.

Five Batch 2 Vessels will replace the earlier four Batch 1 vessels and HMS Clyde, a heavily modified Batch 1 vessel currently patrolling the waters around the Falkland Islands.

The Batch 2 vessels are more capable however have been criticised in Parliament for lacking a helicopter hangar, something that will limit utility of the helicopter deck by preventing embarkation of a helicopter for anything other than very short periods; lacking a medium calibre gun and poor value for money.

The vessels were earlier described at a Defence Select Committee meeting as ships “the Royal Navy does not want or need”. It is understood that the Ministry of Defence paid an extra £100 million for new Offshore Patrol vessels in order to satisfy a requirement to pay BAE a minimum of £230 million per year and despite this, the vessels will be much less capable than vessels of similar price.

A house of Commons Briefing Paper explains the agreement:

“In 2009 the Government signed a 15 year Terms of Business Agreement (TOBA) with BAE Systems and Babcock. The TOBA guaranteed BAE Systems a minimum level of surface ship build and support activity of £230 million a year.

This was judged as the minimum level of work possible to sustain a credible warship-building industry in the UK and thus avoid the delays encountered during the Astute class submarine build caused in part by the loss of skilled staff following the gap between Astute and the Vanguard class submarine build. If cancelled the MoD would be liable for industry closure costs and compensation to BAE Systems.”

The government say that the work to build HMS Forth and her sister ships is sustaining around 800 Scottish jobs.

The five new Offshore Patrol Vessels have been ordered to fill a gap in orders after the second carrier and before the Type 26 frigates begin construction. The first of the five new vessels, HMS Forth, is expected to be handed over to the Royal Navy this year.

Minister for Defence Procurement, Harriett Baldwin, said regarding work starting on the final of the five vessels:

“The start of work on HMS Spey, the fifth Offshore Patrol Vessel, is another milestone in a significant programme of work which is sustaining hundreds of jobs in Scotland and the vital shipbuilding skills needed to build the Royal Navy’s new Type 26 Frigates.”

DE&S CEO Tony Douglas said:

“The team at Defence Equipment and Support has driven the successful delivery of the OPV programme; today’s steel cut is a proud moment not only for us, but for the Royal Navy and our industry partners too.

I am looking forward to continuing this long-standing and close relationship when we begin manufacturing for the Type 26 fleet later in the summer.”

The Batch 2 ships for the Royal Navy include some 29 modifications and enhancements over the Amazonas class corvette built by BAE Systems for the Brazilian Navy. The Royal Navy ships are built to more stringent naval standards, with features such as magazine protection, improved hull integrity and fire safety modifications, as well as greater redundancy.

HMS Forth was christened at a ceremony at the BAE Systems Scotstoun shipyard in Glasgow in March this year and will be handed over later this year.

SHARE Facebook Twitter 

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-severn-decommissioned-year/?utm_source=FB&utm_medium=FacebookPage&utm_campaign=social


Saudações
"Nunca, no campo dos conflitos humanos, tantos deveram tanto a tão poucos." W.Churchil

http://mimilitary.blogspot.pt/
 

*

tenente

  • Investigador
  • *****
  • 10366
  • Recebeu: 5670 vez(es)
  • Enviou: 4363 vez(es)
  • +8478/-1842
Re: Royal Navy
« Responder #299 em: Maio 30, 2017, 07:17:23 pm »
« Última modificação: Maio 30, 2017, 07:31:56 pm por tenente »
Quando um Povo/Governo não Respeita as Suas FFAA, Não Respeita a Sua História nem se Respeita a Si Próprio  !!